2021
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.27.7.074705
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of standardized performance test methods for biomedical Raman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in general, chemometric models implemented in the industry for data analysis are often application-specific and lack transferability. The academia has made good efforts to understand, 96 with basic research and interlaboratory studies, and remove, 97,23 though RMs as well as chemometrics or protocols development, the setup-induced spectral variations, but manufacturers and standardization bodies engagement is key. Raman equipment and firmware offer different options for calibration and validation depending on the manufacturer/model/technique and on the target user, but they should provide complete calibration modules as well as open access to the real raw data and technical details of the applied corrections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in general, chemometric models implemented in the industry for data analysis are often application-specific and lack transferability. The academia has made good efforts to understand, 96 with basic research and interlaboratory studies, and remove, 97,23 though RMs as well as chemometrics or protocols development, the setup-induced spectral variations, but manufacturers and standardization bodies engagement is key. Raman equipment and firmware offer different options for calibration and validation depending on the manufacturer/model/technique and on the target user, but they should provide complete calibration modules as well as open access to the real raw data and technical details of the applied corrections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach can be challenging to integrate in most Raman spectroscopy acquisition workflows due to the requirement of additional equipment and the difficulty of positioning the calibration lamp. 40 Instead, an alternate method for calibrating Raman instruments (e.g., correct for filter, detector etaloning, and quantum efficiency effects 41 ) is based on measurement on a standard reference material (SRM) calibrated and manufactured by NIST (SRM-2241 for 785-nm excitation). 35 Because this method does not involve the use of additional instruments (irradiance source), it is better suited for use in clinical environments where time and space are limited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical methods involve measuring using a spectrum from a reference calibration light source of known emission profile to recover the instrument response function (IRF). However, this approach can be challenging to integrate in most Raman spectroscopy acquisition workflows due to the requirement of additional equipment and the difficulty of positioning the calibration lamp 40 . Instead, an alternate method for calibrating Raman instruments (e.g., correct for filter, detector etaloning, and quantum efficiency effects 41 ) is based on measurement on a standard reference material (SRM) calibrated and manufactured by NIST (SRM-2241 for 785-nm excitation) 35 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1928, C. V. Raman experimentally confirmed the existence of Raman scattering, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1930 138 . The ability of Raman spectroscopy to calculate the composition and structure of analytes based on vibrational information has led to its subsequent widespread use in biomedicine, analytical chemistry, and other fields 139–143 . The weak Raman scattering cross section leads to inefficient Raman scattering, which limits its application in analysis practice due to the lack of sufficient signal intensity.…”
Section: Sers‐based Biosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%