Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical framework that can be used to discuss the question of how context, time and different participatory process designs influence the results of participatory monitoring projects in terms of concrete outputs (such as sustainability indicators) and the more intangible social outcomes (such as learning and stakeholder relations). We will discuss and compare four different cases of participatory monitoring of provincial sustainable development in the Netherlands. The results show sustainability issues selected by the stakeholders reflect the socio-economic and ecological structural characteristics of their region. In a different context, stakeholders not only assign different weights to the same set of issues, but more importantly they select a completely different set of regional aims altogether. Since these regional structural characteristics only change slowly over time, the influence of time on stakeholder preferences is shown to be only of minor importance. However, the dissipation of learning effects is shown to be a fundamental challenge for the cyclical nature of participatory monitoring, especially when its goal is shared agenda building. Another important conclusion is that, in the design of participatory processes, more attention should be devoted to providing stakeholders with the opportunity to comment on an 'intermediate' product.

Healing Brazil's Blue Amazon: The Role of Knowledge Networks in Nurturing Cross-Scale Transformations at the Frontlines of Ocean Sustainability

“…Linkages need to develop both horizontally, between actors and institutions at the same system level, and vertically across system levels and scales, for creating knowledge networks that capacitate governance actors with access to wide-ranging sources of information and knowledge in ways that improve learning and coordination (Young et al, 2007;Newig et al, 2010). Collaborative research and learning processes are thus being increasingly sought to identify and treat complex (or "wicked") problems and the root causes of collective choices that foster (un)sustainable outcomes and (mal)adaptive practices (e.g., Jentoft and Chuenpagdee, 2009;Hermans et al, 2011;Angelstam et al, 2013;Fox et al, 2013;Davies et al, 2015).…”

Public Participation in Water Planning in the Ebro River Basin (Spain) and Tucson Basin (U.S., Arizona): Impact on Water Policy and Adaptive Capacity Building

“…Or conversely, what elements must a process have to reap the well-noted benefits of public participation? Many authors have highlighted the importance of procedural features of the participatory processes while others have focused on the importance of the context in which participation occurs (e.g., [3,[31][32][33]). As a result of both lines of thought, Blanco and Ballester [34] identified five conditions for improving participation's transformational capacity:…”

International E-Conveyancing Strategies: Lessons for South Africa

“…The National e-Conveyancing Development Limited (NECDL) is currently designing a national electronic conveyancing system, using the Victorian system or substantial parts of it to form the basis of a single national system (Clark, 2011). This suggests that a shift is occurring in traditional development strategies moving away from a top-down approach towards more bottom-up approaches characterised by a decentralised style of policy making that also stimulates interaction between private and public bodies (Hermans, Haarmann, & Dagevos, 2011). The need to stimulate sustainable development globally is also increasing.…”