2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Spodick's Sign and Other Electrocardiographic Findings as Indicators of STEMI and Pericarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This data was collected from a single site and has a small number of pericarditis patients, limiting the accuracy of results and generalizability of findings. Further studies are needed to validate these results [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This data was collected from a single site and has a small number of pericarditis patients, limiting the accuracy of results and generalizability of findings. Further studies are needed to validate these results [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our pericarditis-DLM exhibits several powerful applications. Current ECG features differentiating STEMI from acute pericarditis have low specificity in clinical scenarios [ 43 ]. Our pericarditis-DLM correctly diagnosed 78.9% of pericarditis cases and identified 89.8% of STEMI cases as non-pericarditis ECGs, which may effectively help the differential diagnosis between these two diseases in the ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por lo general, no hay cambios durante la despolarización, por lo tanto, en ausencia de una enfermedad cardíaca subyacente, la onda P y los complejos QRS son normales. La depresión del segmento PR es muy específica de la pericarditis aguda y se atribuye a una lesión auricular subepicárdica, y ocurre en todas las derivaciones excepto en aVR y V1; estas derivaciones pueden presentar elevación del segmento PR [9,10]. El signo de Spodick es un segmento TP descendente y está presente en aproximadamente el 80% de los pacientes afectados por pericarditis aguda, este suele visualizarse mejor en la derivación II y en las derivaciones precordiales laterales, y puede servir como una importante herramienta electrocardiográfica para distinguir entre la pericarditis aguda y el síndrome coronario agudo (figura 1).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified