2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Sperm Characteristics in Caspian Stallions Using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for sperm motility and kinetic parameters in all extenders were low, but yet in accordance with Rí Zková et al 2017 [36] in regards to STR (71.20%) and LIN (45.5%). Kinetic parameters for Lactose-jenny colostrum extender showed better results than for Lactose-egg yolk extender (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results for sperm motility and kinetic parameters in all extenders were low, but yet in accordance with Rí Zková et al 2017 [36] in regards to STR (71.20%) and LIN (45.5%). Kinetic parameters for Lactose-jenny colostrum extender showed better results than for Lactose-egg yolk extender (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Evaluation of CASA-derived kinematic parameters revealed significant differences between extenders when fresh and frozen-thawed samples were evaluated in individual stallions, which corresponds to individual differences in other breeds (Ortega-Ferrusola et al 2009;Rezagholizadeh et al 2015). The determination of slight changes in sperm motility is one of the advantages of the CASA system (Verstegen et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affected the total motility analysis, but the results showed that they followed the trend line of the data provided by the expert. On the other hand, the parameter of progressive motility, one of the significant descriptors for fertility together with VAP and VSL (Ahmed et al, 2016) (Rezagholizadeh et al, 2015), had a high coefficient of determination (R2=0.8143) and, therefore, a very good correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%