1994
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1560-1565.1994
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of specificity of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of human Q fever

Abstract: Ninety-five acute-and convalescent-phase serum specimens from 48 patients suspected of having rickettsial or Legionella infections were assayed for antibodies to Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever. To evaluate the specificity of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human Q fever, we compared the ELISA results with those of the indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) test. The ELISA data were analyzed by two different criteria for a positive test. The first criterion for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, serology allows the differentiation of acute and chronic Q fever infections. Methods which have been used include microagglutination (103,163,252), complement fixation (147,246,270), radioimmunoassay (80), IFA (100,270), indirect hemolysis test (370), ELISA (174,272,378,387,406), enzyme-linked immunosorbent fluorescence assay (ELIFA) (320), dot immunoblotting, and Western blotting (35,399). The techniques most commonly used include complement fixation, IFA, ELISA, and microagglutination.…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, serology allows the differentiation of acute and chronic Q fever infections. Methods which have been used include microagglutination (103,163,252), complement fixation (147,246,270), radioimmunoassay (80), IFA (100,270), indirect hemolysis test (370), ELISA (174,272,378,387,406), enzyme-linked immunosorbent fluorescence assay (ELIFA) (320), dot immunoblotting, and Western blotting (35,399). The techniques most commonly used include complement fixation, IFA, ELISA, and microagglutination.…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the clinical diagnosis is difficult, in most instances, the diagnosis of Q fever relies upon serology. Several methods have been described: microagglutination (46,81,123), complement fixation (66,120,134), radioimmunoassay (33), indirect immunofluorescence antibody tests (immunofluorescence assay) (44,134), indirect haemolysis test (183), ELISA (84,133,188,191,201), enzymelinked immunosorbent fluorescence assay (163), dot immunoblotting, and Western immunoblotting (10,198). Criteria to be taken into account in choosing a diagnostic test include its specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, cost, and the amount of antigen required.…”
Section: Specific Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine diagnosis of Q fever is mainly established by serological tests including indirect immunofluorescence (IF) test (2,9), complement fixation (CF) test (11,12) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (23,25). which can be used for detecting the antibodies against C. burnetii antigens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%