2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of spatial resolution of a PET scanner through the simulation and experimental measurement of the recovery coefficient

Abstract: Measurement of the recovery coefficient provides an assessment of tomographic spatial resolution, particularly in clinical studies conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a prerequisite for treatment initiation, all patients had to demonstrate sufficient uptake in pre-therapeutic SSTR-PET computed tomography (CT) [18,19], i.e., lesional uptake higher than physiological liver uptake [21] [22][23][24]. All data was reconstructed using iterative algorithms implemented by the manufacturer and depending on the routine protocol of the different medical centers.…”
Section: Pet/ct Imaging Imaging Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a prerequisite for treatment initiation, all patients had to demonstrate sufficient uptake in pre-therapeutic SSTR-PET computed tomography (CT) [18,19], i.e., lesional uptake higher than physiological liver uptake [21] [22][23][24]. All data was reconstructed using iterative algorithms implemented by the manufacturer and depending on the routine protocol of the different medical centers.…”
Section: Pet/ct Imaging Imaging Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the absence of an effect of this variable in the statistical analyses and the strong test-retest reliability of DERS with a 4 – 8 week interval (Gratz and Roemer, 2004), this should not affect the results. Another limitation relates to the low spatial resolution of PET (Prieto et al, 2010), which generally cannot distinguish between subnuclei of the amygdala that serve different functions and vary in the relative densities of D2 and D3 receptors (Alleweireldt et al, 2006; Grace and Rosenkranz, 2002; Rosenkranz and Grace, 1999). In addition, [ 18 F]fallypride has almost equal affinity for D2 and D3 receptors (Jerjian et al, 2010), preventing a separate assessment of either receptor subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, it can be concluded that FBP is inferior to IT with regard to image quality, as has been extensively reported previously (25,26). Additionally, the reduction of equivalent iterations, that is, the product of iterations and subsets (IT-4), softens the image on the one hand but leads to increased blurring and therefore reduced image quality on the other hand (27)(28)(29). IT-1 to IT-3 do not differ with regard to image quality; therefore, we assume that zoom and matrix do not directly influence the image quality.…”
Section: Comparison Of 131 I Raiu and 124 I Raiumentioning
confidence: 49%