2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2015.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of some predictors for successful weaning from mechanical ventilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the evidence, several demographic, and clinical parameters can influence the patients' success rates of weaning (16). The weaning method used can also affect the failure rate (17). Boniatti and others suggested positive fluid balance and serum levels of hemoglobin and bicarbonate as predictors of weaning failure and re-intubation (15), which is contrary to the results of our study, as we found no significant difference between the patients with successful and failed weaning in terms of Sat.O2, blood pressure, serum levels of hemoglobin, and PH, while the only significant variables were presented as mean GCS, duration of hospital admission, ventilation, and PWT score, and the patients with unsuccessful results had a lower GCS, higher duration of hospital stay and ventilation, as well as lower scores of PWT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…According to the evidence, several demographic, and clinical parameters can influence the patients' success rates of weaning (16). The weaning method used can also affect the failure rate (17). Boniatti and others suggested positive fluid balance and serum levels of hemoglobin and bicarbonate as predictors of weaning failure and re-intubation (15), which is contrary to the results of our study, as we found no significant difference between the patients with successful and failed weaning in terms of Sat.O2, blood pressure, serum levels of hemoglobin, and PH, while the only significant variables were presented as mean GCS, duration of hospital admission, ventilation, and PWT score, and the patients with unsuccessful results had a lower GCS, higher duration of hospital stay and ventilation, as well as lower scores of PWT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…However, PI max still needs a cooperative patient and maximal respiratory effort other than diaphragmatic displacement measured in quiet breathing [6]. In contrast, Mabrouk et al [11], who evaluated some predictors for successful weaning from mechanical ventilation using different weaning modes, found no significant difference between the two groups as regards PI max, which may be because mechanically ventilated patients with nonrespiratory causes were included in his study; moreover, the weaning methods from mechanical ventilation were different in each group and the number of the patients was different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durante o processo de desmame, os pesquisadores utilizaram, além de outros recursos, o Índice de Tobin e a Pimáx como preditores de sucesso no desmame e, nesse contexto, os autores ressaltam que este critério apresentou grande taxa de falso-positivo para a eficácia deste teste como preditor de sucesso do desmame ventilatório 14 . Nesse contexto, outros estudos 15,16,17,18,19 discordam deste resultado, evidenciando que a Pimáx e o Índice de Tobin possuem alta especificidade como preditor para desmame.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified