Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.33762/bvetr.2011.55029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Some External and Internal Egg Quality Traits of Quails Reared in Basrah City

Abstract: This study was designated to evaluate some external and internal characteristics of quail eggs reared in Basrah city. Ten mature female quails were used in the present study. All birds were reared under similar environmental, managerial and hygienic conditions. To assess the egg quality parameters, a total of 100 eggs were randomly collected for 20 days. The values related to egg weight, shape index, shell weight, shell ratio , shell thickness, egg length, Egg width, Shell index and shell surface area (cm 2) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Japanese quail eggs from cage housing system observed in this study were significantly heavier (11.85 vs. 10.93 g) than eggs from aviary housing system (P<0.05). The average weight of Japanese quail eggs from both housing systems observed in this study was close to values of 10.34 g reported by Song et al (2000), 10.58-11.60 g reported by Bagh et al (2016), 11.28 g reported by Kul and Seker (2004), and 11.9 g reported by Sari et al (2016), but some authors recorded lower values such as 7.04 g (Tabeekh, 2011) and 9.22 g (Sato et al, 1989) or higher values such as 12.50 g (Yilmaz et al, 2011), 12.53 g (Alasahan et al, 2015), 12.69 g (Polat et al, 2007), 12.76 g (Narinc et al, 2015), 12.79-14.04 g (Lukanov et al, 2019) and 13.25-13.71 g (Genchev, 2012). Kul and Seker (2004) considered that the differences between the results of the studies of Japanese quail egg quality could result from genetic structure, health condition, flock age, use of different content diets in feeding, and the differences in quail care and management conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Japanese quail eggs from cage housing system observed in this study were significantly heavier (11.85 vs. 10.93 g) than eggs from aviary housing system (P<0.05). The average weight of Japanese quail eggs from both housing systems observed in this study was close to values of 10.34 g reported by Song et al (2000), 10.58-11.60 g reported by Bagh et al (2016), 11.28 g reported by Kul and Seker (2004), and 11.9 g reported by Sari et al (2016), but some authors recorded lower values such as 7.04 g (Tabeekh, 2011) and 9.22 g (Sato et al, 1989) or higher values such as 12.50 g (Yilmaz et al, 2011), 12.53 g (Alasahan et al, 2015), 12.69 g (Polat et al, 2007), 12.76 g (Narinc et al, 2015), 12.79-14.04 g (Lukanov et al, 2019) and 13.25-13.71 g (Genchev, 2012). Kul and Seker (2004) considered that the differences between the results of the studies of Japanese quail egg quality could result from genetic structure, health condition, flock age, use of different content diets in feeding, and the differences in quail care and management conditions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results (Table 8) of egg weight (EW) 9.92-11.19 g and egg content (EC) 7.71 -9.20 g in the current study are much higher than the 7.04 g and 6.76 g, respectively, reported for EW and EC by Tabeekh (2011) for quails. However, egg length 1.81-1.98 cm and egg width, 1.16 -1.30 cm, in current study were lower than the 2.83cm and 2.25, respectively for length and width reported by same author.…”
Section: Egg Quality Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Further to Table 8, other qualities such as albumen and yolk length reported were similar across the diets. However, albumen and yolk weights were different across the treatments and the values were higher when compared to those of Tabeekh (2011).…”
Section: Egg Quality Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Shell thickness, shell membrane thickness, shell ratio, yolk ratio, albumen ratio and Haugh unit were determined following Kirikci et al (2004) and Abd Salman Abu Tabeekh (2011).…”
Section: Internal Egg Quality Parameters Of Various Avian Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%