2015
DOI: 10.1299/mej.15-00087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell performance with anode recirculation using variable flow ejector at rated conditions

Abstract: An anode gas recycle (AGR) system that uses an ejector for a 1 kW solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) was developed to increase the electrical efficiency of combined power generation. The effects of anodic recirculation on the SOFC performance were determined experimentally with a variable flow ejector at a fuel utilization of 0.80 to 0.87 and a steam feed rate of 0 to 1.5 g/min. A quadrupole mass spectrometer was used to identify the recirculation ratio, the gas composition of reformed gas at the SOFC inlet, and tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these forms, we can utmost enhance the inlet flow rates of the reactants for overcoming the mass transport limitation, which would then require recycling of the outflowing gas (off-gas) to achieve a high energy conversion efficiency. [26][27][28] To identify the impact of mass transport limitation on the performance of the microtubular SOFC, we initially measured spatial iV curves along the cell for different inlet flow rates and then derived the conventional (not spatial) iV curves according to 3…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these forms, we can utmost enhance the inlet flow rates of the reactants for overcoming the mass transport limitation, which would then require recycling of the outflowing gas (off-gas) to achieve a high energy conversion efficiency. [26][27][28] To identify the impact of mass transport limitation on the performance of the microtubular SOFC, we initially measured spatial iV curves along the cell for different inlet flow rates and then derived the conventional (not spatial) iV curves according to 3…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%