Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of soil quality in major grain-producing region of the North China Plain: Integrating minimum data set and established critical limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional approach to quantifying SQ measures the values of multiple indicators of SQ to form a composite soil quality index (SQI) (Karaca et al, 2021;Karlen et al, 1997;Tian et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approach to quantifying SQ measures the values of multiple indicators of SQ to form a composite soil quality index (SQI) (Karaca et al, 2021;Karlen et al, 1997;Tian et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with Norm Value Determination was used to obtain the pivotal constitutors (or indicators) of the soil MDS from the soil TDS (Yu et al, 2018;Tian et al, 2020). The grouping process of the PCA was referred to Jin et al (2021b).…”
Section: The Soil Mds Selection and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers want to select a small number of indicators to provide an integrated, comprehensive, and accurate view of the overall soil properties, while maximizing the inclusion of all relevant information about the soil properties and minimizing data redundancy (Andrews et al, 2004). Larson and Pierce (1991) proposed the concept of a minimum data set of soil properties (soil MDS), whose core function is to establish a set of simplified and practical data (including few properties) to replace a large number of complex soil data, and to better grasp the whole characteristics or status of soils (Yu et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019;Tian et al, 2020). Such method saved the substantial cost of time and labor for measurement of all soil properties, and reduce data redundancy due to collinearity among different properties (Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been developed to evaluate soil quality. The most important of which are soil quality indicators (SQI) and fuzzy methods (Qi et al 2009;Askari and Holden 2014;Jahany and Rezapour 2020;Tian et al 2020). The SQI approach has been used extensively to evaluate different soil types due to its flexibility and performance (Nabiollahi et al 2017;Raiesi 2017;Tian et al 2020;dos Santos et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important of which are soil quality indicators (SQI) and fuzzy methods (Qi et al 2009;Askari and Holden 2014;Jahany and Rezapour 2020;Tian et al 2020). The SQI approach has been used extensively to evaluate different soil types due to its flexibility and performance (Nabiollahi et al 2017;Raiesi 2017;Tian et al 2020;dos Santos et al 2021). Soil quality has been also studied concerning various landscape properties including land use, topographic and morphological features (Davari et al 2020;Shao et al 2020;Derakhshan-Babaei et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%