2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2019.100169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of social cognitive measures in an Asian schizophrenia sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buck et al suggested that the psychometric properties of the AIHQ could be improved by expanding self-report items and removing the open-ended questions [35]. The Singaporean psychometric evaluation study conducted by Lim et al showed more favorable results for the AIHQ, further suggesting its utility [15]. The SAT-MC was not included in the initially planned selection of seven tasks but was chosen as the highest rated among candidate social perception tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buck et al suggested that the psychometric properties of the AIHQ could be improved by expanding self-report items and removing the open-ended questions [35]. The Singaporean psychometric evaluation study conducted by Lim et al showed more favorable results for the AIHQ, further suggesting its utility [15]. The SAT-MC was not included in the initially planned selection of seven tasks but was chosen as the highest rated among candidate social perception tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, social cognition research in Asian populations has been limited to specific domains or been inconsistent in its choice of measures [12][13][14]. Following the SCOPE study, Lim et al conducted a psychometric evaluation study examining a similar array of social cognition tasks with Singaporean schizophrenia patients and healthy controls [15]. All participants were fluent in English, and tasks were registered verbatim, without any modifications to the original English versions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AEI test needs to cover a broad sphere of capabilities (perceiving, expressing, understanding, and managing emotions) in both personal and social functioning (Matthews, Zeidner, & Roberts, 2012;Mayer et al, 2008). Testing intelligence requires to measure the whole framework and not just a few parameters of it (Nafukho, 2010), and, in the future AEI research, it is, therefore, necessary to assess AEI using different tests (by every single branch -perceiving, using, understanding, and managing) rather than a single and broader AEI measure, due to the construct validity issues (Lim, Lee, Pinkham, Lam, & Lee, 2019).…”
Section: Seven Principles For the Last Update About Ability Emotionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there has been little effort to test the reliability and validity of the measures recommended by the SCOPE study in languages other than English or in cultural areas outside of the United States. A 2020 study of reliability and validity in Singapore by Lim et al found that even among people who use English as a common language, reliability and validity results may differ by cultural area [ 9 ]. Going forward, as therapies are developed for social cognition, it will be absolutely paramount to examine the effects of cultural differences in the underlying assessments of social cognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%