2016
DOI: 10.18231/2455-6785.2016.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of skeletal and dental parameters in individuals with variations in depth of Curve of Spee

Abstract: Aim: The main aim of this study was to investigate the skeletal and dental relationships in individuals with various depth of curve of Spee in the vertical and horizontal plane. Material Methods: Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and dental cast of 300 patients were taken. The subjects were divided into three groups according to the depth of curve of Spee. Group A (N=100) = Flat curve of Spee i.e. < 2mm, Group B (N=100) = Normal curve of Spee i.e. between 2-4 mm, Group C (N=100) = Deep curve of Spee i.e. >5mm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various characteristics of the studies selected after implementation of the requisite inclusion/exclusion criterion, such as sample size, mean age of the study participants, study objectives, and their respective inferences/outcomes [ 2 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 ] are displayed in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The various characteristics of the studies selected after implementation of the requisite inclusion/exclusion criterion, such as sample size, mean age of the study participants, study objectives, and their respective inferences/outcomes [ 2 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 ] are displayed in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Forest plot of the odds ratio representing the impact status of COS accentuation on masticatory efficiency in the clinical trials [ 2 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] selected for our meta-analysis (assuming a 95% confidence interval). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%