2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of six commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in nasopharyngeal swabs: Better knowledge for better patient management?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have also evaluated the Panbio COVID-19 antigen (Ag) rapid test obtaining sensitivities ranging between 80% to 90% which increased above 95% when the C T value was lower than 25 ( 7 , 10 , 11 ). Although we observed a slightly low overall sensitivity (70%) like that obtained by Andreani et al ( 12 ), this finding was in line with our results. Despite that high sensitivities of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test were first described in samples with a C T of <30 ( 13 ), the results obtained in our comparison were more similar with those observed recently (i.e., 95% to 100% only for C T values of <25) ( 5 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have also evaluated the Panbio COVID-19 antigen (Ag) rapid test obtaining sensitivities ranging between 80% to 90% which increased above 95% when the C T value was lower than 25 ( 7 , 10 , 11 ). Although we observed a slightly low overall sensitivity (70%) like that obtained by Andreani et al ( 12 ), this finding was in line with our results. Despite that high sensitivities of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test were first described in samples with a C T of <30 ( 13 ), the results obtained in our comparison were more similar with those observed recently (i.e., 95% to 100% only for C T values of <25) ( 5 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the rapid antigen test provides less sensitivity and specificity than the RT-PCR technique. The lower sensitivity of rapid antigen kit tests is of paramount concern, and the sensitivity varies widely among different kit types and company brands ( 19 ). Despite these challenges, the specificity is higher in those patients with a higher viral load ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, under a scenario like the COVID-19 pandemic, a reduction in sensitivity is acceptable as long as it comes with an increase in testing capacities, so the final output is a higher number of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals detected ( Mina et al., 2020 ). RDAgTs would fulfill these requirements as they are fast, cheap, and accurate enough to allow massive and rapid detection and isolation of new cases to stop transmission chains and reduce the impact of COVID-19 ( World Health Organization (WHO), 2020 ; Andreani et al., 2021 ; Corman et al., 2021 ; Cubas-Atienzar et al., 2021 ; Lee et al., 2021 ; Pekosz et al., 2021 ; Weiss and Bellmann-Weiler, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as vaccination programs have been progressing slowly in middle- and low-income countries, SARS-CoV-2 circulation is still happening very actively in those settings, threatening COVID-19 pandemic control and eradication through new SARS-CoV-2 variant appearances ( Dhawan et al., 2022 ). RDAgTs have the necessary features to improve effective SARS-CoV-2 surveillance programs in developing countries ( World Health Organization (WHO), 2020 ; Andreani et al., 2021 ; Corman et al., 2021 ; Lee et al., 2021 ; Pekosz et al., 2021 ; Weiss and Bellmann-Weiler, 2021 ). However, the clinical performance evaluation studies for RDAgTs have been done in high-income countries ( Albert et al., 2021 ; Andreani et al., 2021 ; Baro et al., 2021 ; Cerutti et al., 2020 ; Corman et al., 2021 ; Cubas-Atienzar et al., 2021 ; Iglὁi et al., 2021 ; Lee et al., 2021 ; Pérez-García et al., 2021 ; Pollock et al., 2021 ; Pray et al., 2021 ; Tinker et al., 2021 ; Weitzel et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation