2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00169-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of site effects in some localities of ‘Alta Val Tiberina Umbra’ (Italy) by numerical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is in line with those that have been applied for microzonation studies, especially in Central Italy, since the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche seismic sequence (Marcellini and Maugeri, 2001a, b;Pergalani et al, 2003;Mucciarelli and Tiberi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is in line with those that have been applied for microzonation studies, especially in Central Italy, since the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche seismic sequence (Marcellini and Maugeri, 2001a, b;Pergalani et al, 2003;Mucciarelli and Tiberi, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…According to various authors recently involved in seismic microzonation activities in Italy (Tento et al, 2001;Pergalani et al, 2003), F a may be determined as the ratio of the SI calculated at the site to the SI calculated at the bedrock (corresponding in this case to the reference station -R). Therefore, the F a value in each station (Table III) was derived from the average of the SI (station) /SI (reference station) ratios calculated for each event of Table II.…”
Section: Remarks On Seismic Amplification In Fault Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of soil nonlinearity on 2D valley effects has been extensively examined in the literature with various methods ranging from equivalent linear to fully inelastic analysis (Marsh et al, 1995;Zhang and Papageorgiou, 1996;Pavlenko, 2001;Pergalani et al, 2003;Olsen et al, 2006;Lenti et al, 2009;Gelagoti et al, 2010). Most studies conclude that soil inelasticity reduces 2D valley amplification, and hence AG tends to diminish.…”
Section: The Effect Of Soil Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine the predictive power of V S,30 , F 0 (as derived from synthetic amplification functions), and I w . The amplification factor, F a , is used here to define the seismic amplification of a site as proposed by Pergalani et al (1999) and Pergalani et al (2003):…”
Section: Prediction Of Ground Motion Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, F a estimates the average amplification due to the soil properties with respect to rock. F a is an appropriate parameter to evaluate site effects since the spectrum inten- sity SI (Equation 2) relates better to the building damage (the word "damage" is used here to indicate the physical damage of a building and not a measure of structural response) than other ground motion parameters such as PGA, PGV, and S a ͑f͒ (e.g., Pergalani et al 1999, Miyakoshi and Hayashi 2000, Pergalani et al 2003. Indeed, the spectrum intensity accounts for the amplitude and frequency content (in the range of importance for structures) of earthquakes in a single parameter (Kramer 1996, Miyakoshi andHayashi 2000).…”
Section: Psv͑t͒dt ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 99%