2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c07236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Single-Reference DFT-Based Approaches for the Calculation of Spectroscopic Signatures of Excited States Involved in Singlet Fission

Abstract: Singlet fission (SF) has the potential to dramatically increase solar cell efficiency by converting one singlet exciton to two free triplet excitons via a correlated triplet pair intermediate. Identification and characterization of excited states involved in SF are of great importance for understanding the fundamentals of SF. Despite their importance, it is still nontrivial to distinguish various species in transient absorption spectra due to their spectral overlaps and ultrashort lifetimes. Theoretical modeli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak electronic coupling is reinforced by quantum chemical calculations, indicating an absence of NIR absorption bands of the correlated triplet pair. 37,59,60 This contrasts reports on tetracene and pentacene, for which a significant stabilization of 1 (TT) with regard to 2T 1 is observed. 61 While these observations point toward T 1 T 1 , we note that an unambiguous assignment would require the employment of time-resolved electron spin-resonance measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The weak electronic coupling is reinforced by quantum chemical calculations, indicating an absence of NIR absorption bands of the correlated triplet pair. 37,59,60 This contrasts reports on tetracene and pentacene, for which a significant stabilization of 1 (TT) with regard to 2T 1 is observed. 61 While these observations point toward T 1 T 1 , we note that an unambiguous assignment would require the employment of time-resolved electron spin-resonance measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…This is based on the weak binding energy of 1 (TT), that is, E (2T 1 ) – E ( 1 (TT)) (Table ), which facilitates the loss of the interstate coupling. The weak electronic coupling is reinforced by quantum chemical calculations, indicating an absence of NIR absorption bands of the correlated triplet pair. ,, This contrasts reports on tetracene and pentacene, for which a significant stabilization of 1 (TT) with regard to 2T 1 is observed . While these observations point toward T 1 T 1 , we note that an unambiguous assignment would require the employment of time-resolved electron spin-resonance measurements. However, regardless of the exact nature of the triplet pair species, its presence is operative for the mechanism invoked for our dimers and supported by the SADS (applying a kinetic model to the global analysis, Figure S59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous work, we applied SLR methods to ES and two-photon absorption , (where the dipoles involving ES-to-ES transitions are required). Han et al also applied this idea to ES absorption of the TIPS-pentacene system. Previously, we developed two methods: (i) a procedure that uses numerical differentiation to determine transition dipoles for excitations from a selected excited state (if N excited states are selected, then this method requires a solution for N + 1 Casida equations) and (ii) a faster method where only the standard Casida equation is solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the training reference values were obtained from theoretical calculations themselves, such deviations can be considered negligible compared to the errors inherent to the density functional theory (DFT) reference itself. Judging from benchmark studies on the performance of DFT methods for the description of singlet fission molecules [31][32][33] , it is thus fair to assume that the actual excitation energies of our predicted overall distribution will be globally shifted by somewhere between 0.1 and 0.3 eV with respect to possible experimental values, while the trends when comparing individuals inside the distribution are predicted correctly.…”
Section: Machine Learning Of Excitation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%