Evaluation of simple methods for regional mortality forecasts

Abstract

BackgroundIn recent decades, considerable research effort has been dedicated to improving mortality forecasting methods. While making valuable contributions to the literature, the bulk of this research has focused on national populations—yet much planning and service delivery occurs at regional and local scales. More attention needs to be paid to subnational mortality forecasting methods.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate eight fairly simple methods of regional mortality forecasting, focusing specifically on the requirements of practising demographers in government and business.Data and methodsData were sourced primarily from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrospective mortality rate forecasts were produced for 88 regions of Australia for 2006–2016. Regional mortality forecast methods were evaluated on the basis of (i) input data requirements, (ii) ease of calculation, (iii) ease of assumption setting and scenario creation, (iv) plausibility of forecast death rates, (v) smoothness of forecast mortality age profiles, and (vi) forecast accuracy.ResultsTwo of the methods produced noticeably higher forecast errors than the others (National Death Rates and SMR Scaling). Five of the methods were judged to be similar in their overall suitability. Two were particularly easy to implement (Broad Age SMR Scaling and Broad Age Rate Ratio Scaling) and provide a good return on the data and effort required. Two others (Brass Relational and Mortality Surface) produced very smooth mortality age profiles and highly plausible death rates, though were relatively more complex to implement.ConclusionThe choice of mortality forecasting method is important for the accuracy of regional population forecasts. But considerations additional to accuracy are important, including those relating to the plausibility of the forecasts and the ease of implementation.

Regional Disparity of Medical Resources and Its Effect on Mortality Rates in China

“…These studies focused on regional differences, or changes in health levels, and found significant associations between regional differences in health levels, particularly in regional mortality. Many studies have shown that socio-economic factors, rather than natural environment, play an important role in contributing to regional differences in mortality (6,8,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Their findings empirically proved the influence of medical resource on individual health level.…”

Past and projected growth of Australia’s older migrant populations

“…A national life table projection was created for the Australian population overall based on Ediev’s ( 2008 ) mortality forecasting method, with birthplace-specific life expectancy assumed to move in concert with this projection but at fixed lower or higher values according to 2011-2016 life expectancy differentials. Birthplace-specific age-sex-specific death rates corresponding to assumed life expectancies were calculated from the national life tables (Wilson, 2018 ).…”

To what extent is Australia’s population ageing? The application of traditional and alternative ageing measures

“…State and Territory life expectancy at birth was assumed to move in parallel with national life expectancy into the future. Age-specific death rates corresponding to each life expectancy assumption were selected from the national mortality projections (Wilson 2018) for every jurisdiction except the Northern Territory. A separate mortality projection was prepared for the NT because of its unique mortality rate age profile.…”