2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-017-0229-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)

Abstract: BackgroundThe short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer (LAC) have not been fully evaluated in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare the short term surgical outcomes of LAC between the patients older than 75 years and those with non-elderly patients.MethodsThis retrospective multi-institutional study selected patients who underwent LAC between April 2013 and March 2014 at Yokohama City University Hospital and its related general hospitals. The patients were cat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was probably due to adequate evaluation period and preparation to the surgery of the patients on elective oncologic surgery. Moreover, previous studies reported that laparoscopic surgery could be safely performed on elderly patients, and there were no differences in complication rates compared with those of open surgery (5,22). In our study, it was detected that there was no difference in terms of complications between the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and those underwent open surgery, and the survival rates were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result was probably due to adequate evaluation period and preparation to the surgery of the patients on elective oncologic surgery. Moreover, previous studies reported that laparoscopic surgery could be safely performed on elderly patients, and there were no differences in complication rates compared with those of open surgery (5,22). In our study, it was detected that there was no difference in terms of complications between the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and those underwent open surgery, and the survival rates were similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Previous studies reported higher rate of postoperative complications in elderly patients than in younger patients because the rate of comorbidities was higher in elderly patients, they more often required emergency procedures, and physiologic problems arose with increasing age (4). Recent studies reported that abdominal surgery can be safely performed in patients aged ≥70 years (5,6). The efficacy of surgical interventions in these patients should be maximized and surgery should not interfere with the possibility of curing the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage applies primarily to clinical facilities. Literary data clearly confirm that laparoscopic procedures reduce hospitalization time, the length of incapacity to work and return to normal life, and in our case, improve the possibility of further surgical procedures on the aorta [37,38]. The biggest advantage is the mini-invasive approach itself, less trauma of the abdominal wall, less postoperative pain, less analgesics and early rehabilitation and mobilization.…”
Section: Colorectal Tumorssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The type of the surgical approach was determined by each surgeon. In principle, laparoscopic-assisted surgery was performed by a 5-port method under general and epidural anesthesia (17). Functional end-to-end anastomosis was performed for right-sided colectomy, and the double-stapling technique was performed for left-sided colectomy and anterior resection of the rectum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%