1991
DOI: 10.2172/5786639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of severe accident risks: Quantification of major input parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the change is mainly driven by a parameter called "burn completeness," which can be expressed either through a correlation on the gas concentrations 16 or via probability density. 17 This implies that these instantaneous changes can be driven by random parameters.…”
Section: Iiia Extension To Random Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the change is mainly driven by a parameter called "burn completeness," which can be expressed either through a correlation on the gas concentrations 16 or via probability density. 17 This implies that these instantaneous changes can be driven by random parameters.…”
Section: Iiia Extension To Random Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRC 1990S. NRC -1991Harper et al 1990Harper et al , 1991Harper et al , 1992Breeding et al 1992). Another large example is an assessment of seismic risks in the eastern United States (EPRI 1989).…”
Section: Definition Of Distributions For Subjective Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) into groups for the purpose of consequence analysis. In the first step, the source terms are divided into groups on the basis of EF and CF by placing a rectangular grid on a plot of CF vs. EF.…”
Section: Partitioning Of Source Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1c16) Extensive experimental results and mechanistic code calculations underlie the accident-progression analy~is(l'-~~) and the source-term analysis. (21)(22)(23)(24) The MACCS (25)(26)(27)(28) code is used for consequence analysis. Figure 1 provides a schematic diagram that details how these four main parts fit into the overall structure of a PRA.…”
Section: Overview Of the Nureg-1150 Probabilistic Risk Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation