2015
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-015-0849-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of serum (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan clinical performance: kinetic assessment, comparison with galactomannan and evaluation of confounding factors

Abstract: Besides strengthening its overall good clinical performance, we provide evidence that serum BG correlates with clinical outcome and that, once used in combination with GM, BG allows to enhance IFI diagnosis rate. The high sensitivity and NPV, observed in the Intensive Care Unit setting, open to BG validation as a marker for assessment of antifungal treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is that the test is non-specific, resulting in a very low PPV, even if we consider two consecutive positive tests and the 2.7% incidence of fusariosis in our centre, which is much higher than that observed in other regions of the globe. 19,20 The low specificity of BDG has been attributed to frequent false-positive tests related to various factors such as bacteraemia, 9,21 antibiotics, 22 gastrointestinal mucositis 23,24 or surgery, 25 and infusion of blood products. 26 In our study, exposures to potential causes of false-positive BDG test including bacteraemia, use of antibiotics, gastrointestinal mucositis and infusion of blood products were similar in cases and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that the test is non-specific, resulting in a very low PPV, even if we consider two consecutive positive tests and the 2.7% incidence of fusariosis in our centre, which is much higher than that observed in other regions of the globe. 19,20 The low specificity of BDG has been attributed to frequent false-positive tests related to various factors such as bacteraemia, 9,21 antibiotics, 22 gastrointestinal mucositis 23,24 or surgery, 25 and infusion of blood products. 26 In our study, exposures to potential causes of false-positive BDG test including bacteraemia, use of antibiotics, gastrointestinal mucositis and infusion of blood products were similar in cases and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Among the cause of false positivity, previous administration of polyvalent immunoglobulins has been incriminated; as filtration on cellulose filters is part of their manufacturing process, that may release glucan components. 29 Intestinal barrier integrity also seems to be of major importance in false positives. Mucosal injury associated with severe mucositis/colitis due to chemotherapy has been shown to favor false positive BDG result, 30 while Enterococcus digestive colonization and youngest age are known to increase the intestinal permeability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations have reported a BG sensitivity of 60.0-87.9% and specificity of 78.0-80.5%. [11][12][13] The Galactomannan (GM) test is aimed at a specific antigen for Aspergillus and is used for the early diagnosis of Aspergillus infection. In a systematic literature review on pediatric invasive aspergillosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were reported to be 85% and 88%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%