2015
DOI: 10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of seismic assessment procedures for determining deformation demands in RC wall buildings

Abstract: Abstract. This work evaluates the performance of a number of seismic assessment procedures when applied to a case study reinforced concrete (RC) wall building. The performance of each procedure is evaluated through its ability to accurately predict deformation demands, specifically, roof displacement, inter-storey drift ratio and wall curvatures are considered as the key engineering demand parameters. The different procedures include Direct Displacement-Based Assessment, nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the displacement profile is determined, it can be associated with a particular level of seismic hazard via a simplified approach. For building structures, for instance, the computation of displacement profiles for different performance levels has been formulated for RC frames 5,6 and RC shear walls, 7,8 showing, in general, a good agreement with displacement responses obtained through nonlinear response-history analysis (NRHA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Once the displacement profile is determined, it can be associated with a particular level of seismic hazard via a simplified approach. For building structures, for instance, the computation of displacement profiles for different performance levels has been formulated for RC frames 5,6 and RC shear walls, 7,8 showing, in general, a good agreement with displacement responses obtained through nonlinear response-history analysis (NRHA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Five building examples (with plans shown in Figure ) are considered, comprising a three‐story, a five‐story, and three eight‐story infilled RC buildings representative of typical Southern Europe construction practice designed without specific seismic provisions . Two of the eight‐story buildings have nearly identical plans with a perimeter shear wall system (bottom right of Figure ). The only difference is in the length of the walls: In the regular case, walls W1 to W4 are 5.0 m long.…”
Section: Application Of Cs (Vector) In Nonlinear Dynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that after yield, the inter-storey drift ratio tends to increase less quickly (with increasing demand) than prior to yield. This is a result of post-yield wall deformations being due to essentially rigid body rotation only (refer [21]). Figure 5b shows that after flexural yielding, the shear force at the base of the wall continues to increase, albeit at a slower rate.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%