Evaluation of Screening Methods for Bruchid Beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in Greengram (Vigna radiata) and Blackgram (Vigna mungo) genotypes and influence of seed physical characteristics on its infestation

Ponnusamy, Duraimurugan; Pratap, Aditya; Singh, S. K.; Gupta, Sanjeev

doi:10.5958/j.2229-4473.27.1.011

Cited by 23 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fujii and Miyazaki, (1987) reported that TC 1966 was the first bruchid resistant wild cultivar. Ponnusamy et al, (2014) reported KPS1 is bruchid susceptible where V1128 and V2817 are the newly reported and V2709 and V2802 were previously reported bruchid resistant mungbean lines. The present experiment shows that the seven genotypes in cluster III are also resistant to bruchid.…”

Section: Sarkar and Bhattacharyya (2015)mentioning

confidence: 84%

“…This affects the seed viability and consequently incurs direct losses from the farmers to consumers. So, the post-harvest losses are the major obstacles to reach the food security in the developing nations (Ponnusamy et al 2014 andSomta et al 2007). Multivariate analysis is a proven technique that can be applied for assembling genotypes as groups based on their trait similarity from a large number of genetic resources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Diversity analysis of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes for bruchid resistance

Ghosh

Roy

Kundagrami

2019

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is one of the most important pulse crops in the tropical and sub-tropical areas. Although the total production of mungbean is not enough to supplement the nutritional requirement, an additional issue further augments the concern of its use: the post-harvest damage in the storage condition. Bruchids (Callosobruchus chinensis) are major polyphagous storage pest that causes substantial losses, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The objective of the current study was to classify the fifty-two mungbean genotypes into groups based on their bruchid resistant and susceptibility by using multivariate statistical analysis. Since the present study emphasizes the progressive breeding program, the multivariate analysis is expected to effectively demonstrate the diversity of bruchid attack and therefore identify and ensures the correct representation of the resistant genotypes. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) displays the correlation of bruchid morpho-physiological traits and the diversity analysis groups the considered genotypes into four clusters (I-IV). The cluster III contains seven genotypes which are observed most effective against bruchid attack. The PC1 shows 70.83% of variability where PC2 shows 29.17% of variability. PCA picturize the most positive correlation between the number of egg laid (NOEL-0.922) and percentage of seed damage (POSD-0.975) among all the morpho-physiological traits. The cluster III thus helps selecting resistant parents for hybridization in future crop improvement program.

show abstract

Section: Sarkar and Bhattacharyya (2015)mentioning

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diversity analysis of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes for bruchid resistance

Ghosh

Roy

Kundagrami

2019

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In green gram, fewer number of bruchid eggs were recorded on small and shiny seeds as compared to large and dull seeds, and in black gram, small and black seeds recorded lesser number of eggs as compared to large and green seeds (Ponnusamy et al 2014); and the neoplasm formation, thicknesses of podwall, and micromorphological traits attributed for a reduced oviposition rate of female pea weevil on genotype 235,899-1 (Mendesil et al 2016). In Dolichus bean, the foliage color, days to 50% flowering, flower color, pod color, pod texture, and fragrance influenced genotypic susceptibility to M. vitrata (Mallikarjuna et al 2009).…”

Section: Phenological Traitsmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…In general, antibiosis consequences are expressed in terms of weight and size of insects, sex ratio, and proportion of insects entering diapause (Basandrai et al 2011). Four green gram accessions LM 131, V 1123, LM 371, and STY 2633 and three black gram accessions UH 82-5, IC 8219, and SPS 143 were found to be moderately resistant to bruchid C. chinensis having less percentage survival and prolonged developmental period as compared to susceptible check (Ponnusamy et al 2014).…”

Section: Antibiosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinguishing Proof and Utilization of Resistance of Insect Pests in Grain Legumes: Progress and Limitations

Sharma

Jaba

Vashisth

2017

Breeding Insect Resistant Crops for Sustainable Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Major food legumes including chickpea, pigeon pea, cowpea, field pea, lentil, faba bean, black gram, green gram, and Phaseolus beans play a vital role in food, nutritional security, and sustainable crop production. Several insect pests damage grain legumes, of which Helicoverpa armigera; Maruca vitrata; Etiella zinckenella; Spodoptera litura and S. exigua; Melanagromyza obtusa; Ophiomyia phaseoli; Aphis craccivora and Bemisia tabaci; Empoasca spp., Megalurothrips dorsalis, and Caliothrips indicus; Mylabris spp.; and Callosobruchus chinensis crusade extensive losses. Appreciable progress has been made in formulating techniques to evaluate germplasm, mapping populations, and genetically modified crops for resistance to insect pests under field and greenhouse conditions. No-choice and dual-choice cage screening techniques, detached leaf assay, and diet incorporation assays have been standardized to screen for resistance to major insect pests in grain legumes. However, some of these techniques cannot be used to screen against stem flies, pod fly, leafhoppers, thrips, and aphids. There is a need to develop methods for mass multiplication of aforesaid insects to undertake precise phenotyping for resistance to these insects. There is a necessity to identify lines with different resistance mechanisms/components of resistance for gene pyramiding to explicate cultivars with the stable source of resistance to insect pests. Prominent levels of resistance to the pod borers have been found in the wild accessions of chickpea, 132 pigeon pea, and cowpea, which can be exploited to introgress genes to heighten the levels and diversify the basis of resistance to insect pests to build host plant resistance a viable component of pest management in grain legumes for sustainable crop production.

show abstract

“…Mungbean genotypes V 2709 and V2802 were found resistant to bruchid particularly in C. chinensis as reported by Talekar and Lin, (1992) whereas genotype V1128 was found susceptible to bruchid in both C. chinensis and C. maculatus as reported by Imrie and Lambrides, (1998). Ponnusamy et al, (2014) identified bruchid resistant mungbean accessions LM 131, V 1123, LM 371 and STY 2633. The present results are in conformity with most of the previous results.…”

Section: Bruchid Susceptibility Index (Bsi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes against Bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) Attack to Reduce Postharvest Losses

Ghosh¹,

Roy²,

Kundagrami³

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Mungbean is an important pulse crop due to its high protein content. Bruchid is a major storage pest which causes deterioration of seed quality as well as quantity. The grain losses directly affect the agricultural economy and also the human health. Therefore, this issue has to be addressed with high priority. Methods: To address this issue, we have initiated a study to screen the fifty-two mungbean genotypes against the bruchid attack. The initial phase of the experiment was carried out from 2015 to 2017 in the department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Calcutta to the laboratory condition through the no choice test. Result: Using the parameter bruchid susceptibility index according to Dobie, four resistant, ten susceptible, seventeen moderately resistant and twenty-one moderately susceptible mungbean genotypes were identified. The host resistance genotype HUM-8, PM-11-51, APDM-84, VC-639 are identified as the most promising resistant genotype.

show abstract

Evaluation of Screening Methods for Bruchid Beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance in Greengram (Vigna radiata) and Blackgram (Vigna mungo) genotypes and influence of seed physical characteristics on its infestation

Cited by 23 publications

References 0 publications

Diversity analysis of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes for bruchid resistance

Diversity analysis of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes for bruchid resistance

Distinguishing Proof and Utilization of Resistance of Insect Pests in Grain Legumes: Progress and Limitations

Screening of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes against Bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) Attack to Reduce Postharvest Losses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About