2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater and river water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the predictions of viral transmission dynamics based on such data are resistant to changes in the behavior of the public (e.g., testing practices, healthcare-seeking behavior, etc.) (19). On the other hand, certain limitations like environmental conditions (e.g., actual water temperature, dilution of wastewater due to the increased rainfall, the intermittent presence of chemical compounds that can act as PCR inhibitors, and sampling design) can potentially affect the results of WBE (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the predictions of viral transmission dynamics based on such data are resistant to changes in the behavior of the public (e.g., testing practices, healthcare-seeking behavior, etc.) (19). On the other hand, certain limitations like environmental conditions (e.g., actual water temperature, dilution of wastewater due to the increased rainfall, the intermittent presence of chemical compounds that can act as PCR inhibitors, and sampling design) can potentially affect the results of WBE (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of protocols for SARS-CoV-2 RNA isolation from wastewater use initial centrifugation for the removal of debris prior to processing ( 7 , 27 , 28 ). This step is important for reducing the turbidity of wastewater via removing larger particles and finer particles, which could inhibit PCR reaction as well as improve virus recovery (mainly for samples nearer the limit of detection) ( 7 , 29 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, our group evaluated and validated the e ciency of four methods to concentrate and determine SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater and wastewater-enriched river water samples. We observed that ultra ltration and PEG 8000 precipitation showed the best SARS-CoV-2 concentration e ciency to wastewater and river water samples, either in aqueous and suspended solids samples and without pretreatment needed to suspended solid removal 30 . Herein we build on our previous work by applied the wastewater surveillance approach, employing PEG 8000 precipitation methodology, to monitor the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in raw and treated wastewater samples from 22 municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The recovery of the genetic material of SARS-CoV-2 by concentration using PEG 8000 (which is based on the precipitation analyzes) has shown a better yield when compared to other techniques, such as occulation or ultracentrifugation 30,43,44 . Therefore, a lower concentration of organic matter (or reaction inhibitors) in the treated samples, as well as the application of a concentration technique capable of increasing the e ciencies of viral recovery may explain the superior performance of the positivity rate of the treated samples that were concentrated by PEG 8000 compared to the others analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Successful Detection Of Sars-cov-2 In Wastewater Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation