Pond Conservation in Europe 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sampling methods for macroinvertebrate biodiversity estimation in heavily vegetated ponds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O´Connor et al (2004) stated that the box method captured more taxa than a pond-net and it was successful especially in sampling aquatic beetles in dense vegetation. Other additional suitable method for capturing fast-moving invertebrates (e.g., corixids, beetles) is activity traps (Hyvönen and Nummi, 2000;Becerra Jurado et al, 2008), which are more successful especially in dense stands of emergent vegetation and enable better estimation of biodiversity at study sites (Becerra Jurado et al, 2008). Using activity traps in fishpond littorals together with both compared methods seems to be very recommendable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O´Connor et al (2004) stated that the box method captured more taxa than a pond-net and it was successful especially in sampling aquatic beetles in dense vegetation. Other additional suitable method for capturing fast-moving invertebrates (e.g., corixids, beetles) is activity traps (Hyvönen and Nummi, 2000;Becerra Jurado et al, 2008), which are more successful especially in dense stands of emergent vegetation and enable better estimation of biodiversity at study sites (Becerra Jurado et al, 2008). Using activity traps in fishpond littorals together with both compared methods seems to be very recommendable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%