2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of sample treatments in a safe and straightforward procedure for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate four sample treatments in a safe and simple procedure for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva. Methods Four sample treatments in three-step procedure for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, consisting in 1) heating at 95 °C during 5 minutes for sample inactivation, 2) sample treatment, and 3) analysis by RT-LAMP were evaluated using saliva samples with known amounts of added viral particles and saliva from infected individuals. Result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has also been modified replacing the use of proteinase K with a temperature gradient by heating at 95˚C/75˚C [31]. Saliva swabs have been reported having high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of influenza virus by the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV test with a high overall agreement and Ct correlation with nasopharyngeal specimens [32]. In the present work, saliva samples were treated with proteinase K. A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing in triplicate (n = 3) samples of RNA purified using each extraction method, SalivaDirect TM [18] and in house Laboratory Developed Test (LDT).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has also been modified replacing the use of proteinase K with a temperature gradient by heating at 95˚C/75˚C [31]. Saliva swabs have been reported having high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of influenza virus by the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV test with a high overall agreement and Ct correlation with nasopharyngeal specimens [32]. In the present work, saliva samples were treated with proteinase K. A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing in triplicate (n = 3) samples of RNA purified using each extraction method, SalivaDirect TM [18] and in house Laboratory Developed Test (LDT).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detergent treatments for potentially infectious matrices were introduced into the manufacturing processes of medical products more than 20 years ago [ 23 ] and have contributed to the overall safety of laboratory procedures. Additionally, when compared with heat inactivation procedures, detergents seem to have less significant impacts on the clinical chemistry and the analysis of hematology parameters [ 24 ]. Although NP-40 has been used less extensively for virus inactivation, Triton X-100 is a well-established method because of its lack of interference in the analysis of biofluids, such as human plasma and blood [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NP-40 has been used less extensively for virus inactivation, Triton X-100 is a well-established method because of its lack of interference in the analysis of biofluids, such as human plasma and blood [ 25 ]. Hersberger et al, [ 26 ] additionally showed that the latter does not seem to interfere with the performance of most chemical and hematological assays; though, Rubio and Franco-Martínez [ 24 ] reported that its presence at 0.5% concentration might interfere with the colorimetric lamp. However, the possible influence of the detergents used in this study on the analysis of porcine serum biomarkers and/or analytical tests remains to be studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva has gained special importance in recent years as a diagnostic fluid since it is easy to obtain by a non-invasive sampling process. The SARS-CoV-2 virus can be detected in this fluid as well as the immunoglobulins directly produced after the immune response 3 5 . Overall, saliva could serve as a possible source of potential biomarkers in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 5 , 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SARS-CoV-2 virus can be detected in this fluid as well as the immunoglobulins directly produced after the immune response 3 5 . Overall, saliva could serve as a possible source of potential biomarkers in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 5 , 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%