2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06092-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the brain are neuromodulation treatments with the objective of enhancing neural pathways for different systems, including motor recovery, aphasia, and dysphagia. Their evidence is limited, 9,10 and they are not recommended by clinical guidelines for routine treatment, but research evaluating their efficacy and safety is growing. Given their complexity in administration, these treatments are typically delivered in person.…”
Section: Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the brain are neuromodulation treatments with the objective of enhancing neural pathways for different systems, including motor recovery, aphasia, and dysphagia. Their evidence is limited, 9,10 and they are not recommended by clinical guidelines for routine treatment, but research evaluating their efficacy and safety is growing. Given their complexity in administration, these treatments are typically delivered in person.…”
Section: Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tDCS and repetitive TMS (rTMS) are the most commonly investigated methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in post-stroke aphasia, with only minimal investigation in motor speech disorders (e.g., [76]). Recent reviews and meta-analyses of tDCS and rTMS have shown accumulating evidence of positive effects on specific language targets, such as naming, but neither can be confidently labeled as effective/efficacious (tDCS: [23,77,78,79,80]; rTMS: [81,82,83,84]). Likewise, additional study of more functional outcomes and individuals in the subacute phase (particularly for tDCS) also is needed.…”
Section: Language Speech and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a devastating condition to most stroke patients, aphasia affects nearly every social activity and interaction [4]. Current treatments focus on rehabilitation are reports of some improvement in language function, such as intensive speech and language therapy (iSLT) [5, 6], as well as low-frequency electrical stimulation therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) [7], and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) [8]. However, patients who reach the plateau stage have difficulty in further improving their language function [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%