Evaluation of routing protocols for video transmission over MANETs that use multiple interfaces and multiple channels per node

Bouras, Christos; Kapoulas, Vaggelis; Γκάμας, Απόστολος; Politaki, Dimitra; Tsanai, Enea

doi:10.1109/icon.2013.6781954

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MANETs offer the freedom to use mobile devices and move independently of the location of base stations (and outside their coverage) with the help of other network devices [1]. These kinds of networks are very flexible, thus they do not enquire any vacant infrastructure or essential administration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Evaluation of routing protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV to enhance video transmission over Mobile Ad hoc Networks

Chandrakar

Kushwaha²,

Choubey

2015

2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Engineering Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad hocNetworks (MANETs) are becoming more important to wireless communications due to increasing popularity of mobile devices. The main challenge for future wireless networks is the quality of service for consumer satisfaction. The tool is supporting us with instant video transmissions such as video conferences and webinars. Multiple network hops are necessary to deliver and exchange data across a network. Each Mobile node also performs as a router which forwards the packets to their nearest hop and thus finally the packet reaches to the destination. First, describes the uniqueness of Mobile Ad hoc Networks and their Routing protocol, and second a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) which consists of set mobile wireless nodes and one fixed wireless server are design using ns-2.In this research paper simulation of threeMANET routing protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV are doneonthe basis of three performance parameters i.e. Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), End-to-End delay and Throughput.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Evaluation of routing protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV to enhance video transmission over Mobile Ad hoc Networks

Chandrakar

Kushwaha²,

Choubey

2015

2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Engineering Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Then, we perform a comparative performance evaluation of MIMC approach in three routing protocols [9] (see section 6: Comparative Performance Evaluation of MIMC in Existing MA-NET Routing Protocols) in order to select the MANET routing protocol which supports better the MIMC. • Finally, we perform an evaluation of the new proposed MIMC approach with the channel selection mechanism in the performance of the AODV routing protocol, which seems to better support the MIMC concept [11] (see section 7: Performance Evaluation of proposed MIMC approach). • Finally, we perform an evaluation of the new proposed MIMC approach with the channel selection mechanism in the performance of the AODV routing protocol, which seems to better support the MIMC concept [11] (see section 7: Performance Evaluation of proposed MIMC approach).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Big catastrophes, over the past few years, have shown that wired telecommunications and common static wireless infrastructures are vulnerable and not efficient for usage when disasters take place. In MANETs, each device equipped with During the performance evaluation we follow the approach ( [8,9]):…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Initially, we evaluate the effect of using MIMC in the performance of the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) [10] routing protocol (see section 5: Performance Evaluation of MIMC in AODV). • Then, we perform a comparative performance evaluation of MIMC approach in three routing protocols [9] (see section 6: Comparative Performance Evaluation of MIMC in Existing MA-NET Routing Protocols) in order to select the MANET routing protocol which supports better the MIMC. This comparative evaluation indicates AODV as the best (among the three routing protocols in evaluation) routing protocol to support MIMC approach.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This comparative evaluation indicates AODV as the best (among the three routing protocols in evaluation) routing protocol to support MIMC approach. • Finally, we perform an evaluation of the new proposed MIMC approach with the channel selection mechanism in the performance of the AODV routing protocol, which seems to better support the MIMC concept [11] (see section 7: Performance Evaluation of proposed MIMC approach).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Video transmission in mobile ad hoc networks using multiple interfaces and multiple channels

Bouras

Γκάμας

Kapoulas

et al. 2016

Int J Communication

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad hoc NETworks (MANETs) are an important part of wireless communications and the increasing use of mobile devices is confirming that. MANETs can be of great value in Emergency Response situations where communication between mobile deployed units is critical and wired or wireless infrastructures may not be present or functional. In emergency scenarios, multimedia communication is very important for decision making and situation assessment. This requires up-to-date (on-line) information feed on the situation, including voice and video from the affected zone. However, MANETs do not seem to efficiently support multimedia applications, and this is quite evident in video transmission. One way to remedy this is to use more (wireless) interfaces per mobile node and consequently more communication channels. In this work, we perform an analytical study on the use of multiple interfaces and multiple channels (MIMC) in video transmission with respect to the requirements of Emergency Response Ad hoc Networks. More specifically, we examine and present the impact of using MIMC on MANETs during video transmission applications, we evaluate the performance of three basic routing protocols in MANETs, and we propose a channel selection mechanism in MANET nodes with MIMC for enhanced video transmission. In addition, we evaluate video transmission streams with rate adaptation and present comparative results. The proposed mechanism is evaluated using the ns-2 network simulator and the simulations are performed for a variety of topologies. Simulation results show that the different routing protocols respond differently when MIMC is introduced. The Ad hoc On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector and (especially) the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector routing protocols benefit significantly, while the Destination Sequenced Distance Vector shows fewer improvements. The proposed mechanism is shown to be beneficial for transmitting video streams and enhances the network's ability to accommodate more streams and reduce packet delay.

show abstract

QoS for Video Transmission in MANETs: ASurvey

Гупта

VinayRishiwal²,

Kulkarni

et al. 2018

2018 3rd International Conference on Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of routing protocols for video transmission over MANETs that use multiple interfaces and multiple channels per node

Cited by 4 publications

References 9 publications

Evaluation of routing protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV to enhance video transmission over Mobile Ad hoc Networks

Evaluation of routing protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV to enhance video transmission over Mobile Ad hoc Networks

Video transmission in mobile ad hoc networks using multiple interfaces and multiple channels

QoS for Video Transmission in MANETs: ASurvey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About