2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Root Canal Debridement of Human Molars Using the GentleWave System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Research demonstrates that bacteria remaining after endodontic therapy typically resides in complex anatomical regions, such as the lateral canals and isthmi. 18,24,25 New endodontic technologies have emerged in the last few decades, which aimed at addressing current limitations. Although many endodontic therapies have been introduced, including negative-pressure irrigation, ultrasonic irrigation, sonic irrigation, laser, and photoinduced photo-acoustic streaming (PIPS), none have provided sufficient evidence of adequate debridement and disinfection within the root canal system to prevent the onset and exacerbation of apical periodontitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Research demonstrates that bacteria remaining after endodontic therapy typically resides in complex anatomical regions, such as the lateral canals and isthmi. 18,24,25 New endodontic technologies have emerged in the last few decades, which aimed at addressing current limitations. Although many endodontic therapies have been introduced, including negative-pressure irrigation, ultrasonic irrigation, sonic irrigation, laser, and photoinduced photo-acoustic streaming (PIPS), none have provided sufficient evidence of adequate debridement and disinfection within the root canal system to prevent the onset and exacerbation of apical periodontitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In apical pressure testing, when teeth were filed from size 15/.04 to perforating the apical foramen with file size #40, the GentleWave Procedure created negative apical pressure compared with standard needle irrigation which created positive apical pressures. 17 Molina et al 18 revealed debridement capabilities of 97.2% for the GentleWave Procedure and 67.8% for standard root canal therapy in a histology study on mesiolingual and mesiobuccal roots of endodontically treated molar teeth. Longterm healing rates following endodontic therapy with the GentleWave Procedure demonstrate 97.4 and 97.3% respectively, success at 6 and 12 months, respectively.…”
Section: 5005/jp-journals-10024-2264mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A histological study of 45 endodontically treated molars compared root canal debridement efficacy of standard rotary instrumentation with needle irrigation versus minimal instrumentation with the GentleWave Procedure. Results revealed 97.2% cleaning and debridement capabilities for the GentleWave System as compared to 67.8% for standard root canal therapy [46].A multicenter, prospective study of 75 molars treated with the GentleWave Procedure showed a 97% success rate at 12 months with 96.2% of patients being free from severe and moderate posttreatment pain in the first two postoperative days and no incidence of pain reported by day 14 [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Final apical enlargement was completed to full working length with a file size of #20.07. Cleaning and disinfection were performed using the GentleWave® Procedure (Sonendo, Laguna Hills, CA) ( Figure 2) [11][12][13]. Canals were subsequently dried with absorbent paper points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%