2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00674.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Right Atrial Size in Patients with Atrial Arrhythmias: Comparison of 2D versus Real Time 3D Echocardiography

Abstract: Real time 3DE is highly feasible for right atrial volume determination. The results demonstrate that measurements of dimensions using 2D echocardiography may not accurately assess right atrial size. If 3DE is not available, apical 4CH planimetry area is a simple alternative that may be used for evaluating right atrial size in clinical practice. The 2D-derived right atrial volume by single plane area-length method was not better correlated with 3DE volume than four-chamber planimetry area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our retrospective review of clinically acquired studies prohibited direct volume measurements as the short-axis images of the heart were truncated just basal to the atrioventricular valves and therefore did not cover the entire right atrium. However, the correlation between the area-length measurement and the volumetric measurement of RA volume is relatively good both by echocardiography (r = 0.70 for area-length method vs. 3D echo method [37]) and MRI (r = 0.65 vs. real RA volume [35]). While we assessed RAEF by cMRI , which is not available for patient care in all areas, this parameter can also be estimated by echocardiography as well such that further analyses of echo-derived RAEF in PH will be of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our retrospective review of clinically acquired studies prohibited direct volume measurements as the short-axis images of the heart were truncated just basal to the atrioventricular valves and therefore did not cover the entire right atrium. However, the correlation between the area-length measurement and the volumetric measurement of RA volume is relatively good both by echocardiography (r = 0.70 for area-length method vs. 3D echo method [37]) and MRI (r = 0.65 vs. real RA volume [35]). While we assessed RAEF by cMRI , which is not available for patient care in all areas, this parameter can also be estimated by echocardiography as well such that further analyses of echo-derived RAEF in PH will be of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This has been explained by the relative insensitivity of conventional and TDI-derived echocardiographic methods that may not be able to detect early abnormalities in longitudinal function, in contrast to strain rate imaging methods. [18][19][20][21][22][23] However, the implied superiority of strain imaging emerged almost exclusively from examinations of the left ventricle [18][19][20]24) which may not be simply transferred to the right ventricle. Moreover, although regional RV strain represents a potential means to assess myocardial contractility that is less load-dependent, there is still a lack of normative data and the measure is angle dependent with a poor-signal-to noise ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 The feasibility of RT3DE evaluation of right atrial (RA) volume and its superiority over 2DE measurements also were recently demonstrated. 59 Nevertheless, RT3DE measurements of either LA or RA volumes have yet to be validated against an independent reference technique such as CMR. Importantly, these studies require CMR acquisition to be specifically targeted to LA or RA quantification, including appropriate imaging planes and sufficient number of slices, to provide accurate CMR reference values.…”
Section: Rt3de Evaluation Of Atrial Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%