2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Rh/Ce x Ti 1−x O 2 catalysts for synthesis of oxygenates from syngas using XPS and TPR techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ce/Al 2 O 3 catalyst did not exhibit noticeable 3d peaks that are associated with CeO 2 , likely due to the low surface distribution. Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (I) and Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (II), however, exhibited well-developed 3d peaks from the Ce 4+ oxides [41]. The surface content of CeO 2 (0.67 wt %) on Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (I) was greater (0.40 wt %) relative to Ce/Al 2 O 3 only ( …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ce/Al 2 O 3 catalyst did not exhibit noticeable 3d peaks that are associated with CeO 2 , likely due to the low surface distribution. Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (I) and Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (II), however, exhibited well-developed 3d peaks from the Ce 4+ oxides [41]. The surface content of CeO 2 (0.67 wt %) on Mg-Ce/Al 2 O 3 (I) was greater (0.40 wt %) relative to Ce/Al 2 O 3 only ( …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed shift in Ce and Ti signals suggests an interaction between both components. Sheerin et al prepared mixed Ce–Ti oxides containing different Ce and Ti loadings, and a similar shift in Ti signal was observed. XRD and textural properties also pointed in this direction, to the formation of a Ti–Ce solid solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As the heating process promoted the oxidation of cerium, some part of Ce 3+ was transformed into Ce 4+ . These envelopes conrmed the coexistence of both Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ , 40 as well as O 1s spectrum (Fig. 4c); two bonds of Ce with O were formed, which were CeO 2 with a binding energy of 529.0 eV and CeOOH with a binding energy of 531.3 eV.…”
Section: Surface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 98%