2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in Moroccan patients with multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with other studies Zamzam et al (14) , Khalil et al (15) and Singh et al (16) . Also, Soufi et al (17) evaluated retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Total RNFL thicknesses were significantly lower in MS eyes compared to healthy control eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with other studies Zamzam et al (14) , Khalil et al (15) and Singh et al (16) . Also, Soufi et al (17) evaluated retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in patients with multiple sclerosis. Total RNFL thicknesses were significantly lower in MS eyes compared to healthy control eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…172 RNFL thickness is reduced in ON and MS patients compared with healthy controls (Figure 2). This is seen using OCT in eyes with prior ON, 171,[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187] particularly temporally and inferiorly. 176,177,188 The majority of studies also identified reduced pRNFL thickness in MS patients without prior history of ON (MS-NON), although to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Oct In Multiple Sclerosismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Secondly, a study conducted in [11] assessed the thickness of the RNFL in individuals suffering from MS by using OCT scans. The study included 31 individuals with confirmed MS and 31 disease-free subjects.…”
Section: Cross-sectional / Thickness Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%