2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1724-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of relative effect potencies (REPs) for dioxin-like compounds to derive systemic or human-specific TEFs to improve human risk assessment

Abstract: Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) are generally applied for estimating human risk of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds using systemic (e.g., blood) levels, even though these TEFs are established based on intake doses in rodent studies. This review shows that systemic relative effect potencies (REPs) can deviate substantially from intake REPs, but are similar to in vitro-derived REPs. Interestingly, the in vitro REPs for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) and 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (4-P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our human REPs with WHO-TEF values (Van den Berg et al, 2006), with consensus toxicity factors (CTF) for compounds, World Health Organization toxic equivalency factors (Larsson et al, 2015), and with published data on REPs for DLCs (Haws et al, 2006; van Ede et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We compared our human REPs with WHO-TEF values (Van den Berg et al, 2006), with consensus toxicity factors (CTF) for compounds, World Health Organization toxic equivalency factors (Larsson et al, 2015), and with published data on REPs for DLCs (Haws et al, 2006; van Ede et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we compared our REP data with values in the REP 2004 database (Haws et al, 2006) and the newly derived REPs published recently (van Ede et al, 2016). From the REP 2004 database we included into Table 3 the minimum, maximum, and median values published for in vivo data (see Table 8 of Haws et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations