2020
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6695/2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of recurrence and surgical complementation rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal non-pedunculated lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No patient presented recurrence after 4 weeks, and after a revision of medical records; no recurrence was found after follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months. Local recurrence is not worrisome because it can be managed endoscopically with a high success rates, but should be monitored with care in advanced adenomas 5. Obviously, we need further studies to elucidate the role of PRP in the risk of adenoma recurrence and how should be the most appropriate follow-up colonoscopy in patients with high-risk of incomplete resection in which you plan to use PRP as a coverage agent or submucosal injection to prevent delayed bleeding or perforation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No patient presented recurrence after 4 weeks, and after a revision of medical records; no recurrence was found after follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months. Local recurrence is not worrisome because it can be managed endoscopically with a high success rates, but should be monitored with care in advanced adenomas 5. Obviously, we need further studies to elucidate the role of PRP in the risk of adenoma recurrence and how should be the most appropriate follow-up colonoscopy in patients with high-risk of incomplete resection in which you plan to use PRP as a coverage agent or submucosal injection to prevent delayed bleeding or perforation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%