2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of recovery in lip closing pressure and occlusal force and contact area after orthognathic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The LPs recorded in this study were higher in men than in women. This agrees with previous findings . Tsuga et al reported LPs of approximately 10 and 5 kPa in a group of male and female subjects, respectively, by using a balloon probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LPs recorded in this study were higher in men than in women. This agrees with previous findings . Tsuga et al reported LPs of approximately 10 and 5 kPa in a group of male and female subjects, respectively, by using a balloon probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The last values lay approximately in the range recorded using the CS in our study. Ueki et al recorded a lip‐closing force of 12.7 ± 1.1 N in healthy adult women (age = 29.5 ± 4.9 years) and 15.0 ± 1.8 N in healthy adult men (age = 25.4 ± 7.9 years) by using a lip holder device (Lip De Cum, Cosmos Inst. Co. Ltd) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the previous studies included patients with various degrees of malocclusion and analysed lip closing force and tongue pressure changes before and after certain treatment . There were few researches focused on individual normal occlusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,32,33 In horizontal direction, Takada et al 34 Most of the previous studies included patients with various degrees of malocclusion and analysed lip closing force and tongue pressure changes before and after certain treatment. [38][39][40] There were few researches focused on individual normal occlusions. The prevalence of normal occlusion relationships was rather low, about 7%-10.9%.…”
Section: Malocclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%