1990
DOI: 10.1094/asbcj-48-0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Recent Techniques Used to Identify Individual Strains ofSaccharomycesYeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differentiation of brewing strains has been reviewed by Quain (25) and Casey et al (26). Traditional approaches include examining colony morphology on plates (27), the ability of yeasts to metabolize melibiose (lager strains can do so due to their elaboration of an ␣-galactosidase, whereas ale strains cannot [28]), temperature tolerance (29), flocculation tests (2), behavior in smallscale fermenters (30,31), and oxygen requirements (32,33).…”
Section: Typing Of Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differentiation of brewing strains has been reviewed by Quain (25) and Casey et al (26). Traditional approaches include examining colony morphology on plates (27), the ability of yeasts to metabolize melibiose (lager strains can do so due to their elaboration of an ␣-galactosidase, whereas ale strains cannot [28]), temperature tolerance (29), flocculation tests (2), behavior in smallscale fermenters (30,31), and oxygen requirements (32,33).…”
Section: Typing Of Yeastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of spontaneous mutants, characterised by increased flocculation potential, have been noted to occur after approximately 6-10 generations in a lager yeast strain 9,49,53 and around 24 generations in an ale type strain 46 , while instances of reduced flocculation over time have also been reported 44 . Although changes to flocculation characteristics are perhaps the most frequent type of mutations observed, genetic drift during the course of serial repitching may also be the cause of differences in wort sugar utilisation 16 , diacetyl reduction 48 and the accumulation of petite mutants 11,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the conventional methods are often unable to discriminate at a subspecies level and provide doubtful identifications which limit their applications (Casey et al 1990;Querol et al 1992). This has encouraged the use of molecular techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%