“…The ERA5 at 31 km resolution and hourly outputs (Hersbach et al., 2020), its predecessor ERA‐Interim at 79 km and three‐hourly outputs (Dee et al., 2011), or the MERRA‐2 at about 50 km (Gelaro et al., 2017) are examples for global reanalyzes that are used in the context of renewable energy planning and potential assessments for different spatial domains (e.g., Caglayan et al., 2019; Jurasz et al., 2021; Ryberg et al., 2019; Zhang, Ren, et al., 2020). Many studies have addressed the suitability of these or similar reanalysis data sets for REP assessments, and depending on the study site and data set, even lower resolution data are considered as suitable inputs (Doddy Clarke et al., 2021; Kanwal et al., 2022); for certain studies the reanalyzes systematically underestimate wind speeds (Tahir et al., 2018). In general, higher temporal as well as spatial resolutions in model outputs lead to better agreement with observations (Davidson & Millstein, 2022; Samal, 2021).…”