2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective workload during whole-body vibration exposure while seated in upright and twisted postures with and without armrests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For investigation of these two exposures, several measuring techniques and evaluation methods have been introduced for both laboratory and field measurements. Laboratory studies 3) show that a greater workload and a severe decrease in performance is experienced when subjects are seated in a twisted posture with no armrest support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For investigation of these two exposures, several measuring techniques and evaluation methods have been introduced for both laboratory and field measurements. Laboratory studies 3) show that a greater workload and a severe decrease in performance is experienced when subjects are seated in a twisted posture with no armrest support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that low levels of vibration did not adversely affect performance when using these computer devices. However, other studies have shown that it is possible to compensate for disturbances due to WBV, maintaining task performance, but at the cost of increases in mental and physical workload (Conway et al, 2007;Newell and Mansfield, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase of electromyography latency of trunk muscles for 68.7 ms on average was measured in the vibration condition compared to non-vibration condition. Another study [37] investigated the influence of different sitting postures during work on reaction time and perceived workload of 21 subjects exposed to [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Hz random WBV in vertical and longitudinal directions. Subjects had to complete a choice reaction time task while seated in different posture conditions and NASA task load index workload assessment after the task.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of Wbv On Reaction Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%