1964
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1964.100021132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of rate constants from thermogravimetric data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TG curves of ligand PTTA and its complexes were compared in order to determine the influence of metal ion on the thermal stability. Thermal stabilities have been compared on the basis of initial decomposition temperature, residual percentage by weight at a particular temperature, and energy of activation (E) calculated by Fuoss method [17]. PTTA and its complexes with Ni(II)-Sal and Cu(II)-Sal show stepwise degradation whereas PTTA-Co(II)-Sal complex exhibits continuous degradation above 250 ∘ C, and the weight becomes constant above 550 ∘ C in all the cases.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TG curves of ligand PTTA and its complexes were compared in order to determine the influence of metal ion on the thermal stability. Thermal stabilities have been compared on the basis of initial decomposition temperature, residual percentage by weight at a particular temperature, and energy of activation (E) calculated by Fuoss method [17]. PTTA and its complexes with Ni(II)-Sal and Cu(II)-Sal show stepwise degradation whereas PTTA-Co(II)-Sal complex exhibits continuous degradation above 250 ∘ C, and the weight becomes constant above 550 ∘ C in all the cases.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second model was developed during this study to describe the pyrolysis kinetics on a more fundamental basis. This model incorporates a statistical reaction pathway model, which has successfully been applied to Bockhorn and Knü mann (1993) 200-600 0-50 1.1 8.3 × 10 19 310 c,b Cascaval (1970) 355-810 0 83 a,d 355-810 1 90 a,d Fuoss et al (1964) 394 1 5.0 × 10 24 323 d Jellinek (1950) 348-400 0 10 13.1 188 a,d,e Kishore et al (1976) 290-390 50-90 0 134 c,b Kokta et al (1973) 200-500 1 100-140 g 200-500 1 190-230 g Kuroki et al (1982) 310-390 1 1.8 × 10 11 152 b Madorsky (1953) 335-355 1 9.0 × 10 15 244 a Malhotra et al (1975) 180-390 1 189-440 b Mehmet and Roche (1976) 200-700 1 10 14.5 -10 15 219-229 a,i Mertens et al (1982) 500-800 1 92 c Risby et al (1982) Mw 100.000 g/mol 200-600 1 3.6 × 10 13 176 Mw 390.000 g/mol 200-600 1 6.1 × 10 12 165 Sato et al (1983) 100-600 0.75 3.5 × 10 11 177 b Wu et al (1993) 367-487 0.5 5.0 × 10 10 173 c this study 365-400 70-90 1 3.3 × 10 13 204…”
Section: Random Chain Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the activation energies calculated from the rate analysis of the thermal degradation of polymers in the literature are higher than 30kcal/mol [26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. That is, the thermal degradation of polymers is a rate process in which a chemical reaction plays the role of rate controlling step.…”
Section: Gas-liquid Interface In Working Reactor and The Rate Control...mentioning
confidence: 99%