1981
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1981.10465217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of RAM Model for Cleveland, Ohio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table IV lists the day of the year and the number of highs associated with the day., Only Day 301 appears in both columns as being a high observed and predicted concentration. This result agrees well with the conclusions of the previous Cleveland RAM study; 5 i.e. the model predictions had the same relative absolute value as the Figure 1.…”
Section: Cumulative Frequency Distributionssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table IV lists the day of the year and the number of highs associated with the day., Only Day 301 appears in both columns as being a high observed and predicted concentration. This result agrees well with the conclusions of the previous Cleveland RAM study; 5 i.e. the model predictions had the same relative absolute value as the Figure 1.…”
Section: Cumulative Frequency Distributionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…5 PLD is applied to a CO data set and it is shown to fit it better than the lognormal distribution. An explanation of why the PLD has a limited range of coefficient of variation is presented along with a modification to the PLD that would allow it to be applied to air quality data sets which are out of the permissible range of the PLD.…”
Section: Harvard Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation