2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4577-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of radiological risks due to natural radioactivity around Lynas Advanced Material Plant environment, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

Abstract: Understanding the public awareness concerning the Lynas Advanced Material Plant (LAMP), an Australian rare earths processing plant located in Malaysia, a radiological study in soil and water samples collected at random surrounding the LAMP environment was undertaken using HPGe gamma-ray spectrometry. The mean soil activities for (226)Ra, (232)Th, and (40)K were found to be 6.56 ± 0.20, 10.62 ± 0.42, and 41.02 ± 0.67 Bq/kg, respectively, while for water samples were 0.33 ± 0.05, 0.18 ± 0.04, and 4.72 ± 0.29 Bq/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average excess lifetime cancer risks due to the levels of radionuclides in rock and soil samples are 1.98 × 10 −4 and 1.12 × 10 −4 , respectively. The values are lower than the world average figure of 0.29 × 10 −3 for soil and 0.05 for low-level radiation exposures as recommended by UNSCEAR and ICRP (Kolo et al 2015). …”
Section: Natural Radionuclidescontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The average excess lifetime cancer risks due to the levels of radionuclides in rock and soil samples are 1.98 × 10 −4 and 1.12 × 10 −4 , respectively. The values are lower than the world average figure of 0.29 × 10 −3 for soil and 0.05 for low-level radiation exposures as recommended by UNSCEAR and ICRP (Kolo et al 2015). …”
Section: Natural Radionuclidescontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…A comparison of the average values of the activity concentrations in this study (that is, 1190.10 BqKg −1 for 40 K, 64.64 BqKg −1 for 226 Ra, and 110.18 Bqkg −1 for 232 Th) with the corresponding average values from the results reported in Nigeria, Egypt, Malaysia, India, Turkey, and Iraq (Ajayi, 2009;Ademola, Bello, & Adejumobi, 2014;El-Gamal, Farid, Abdel Mageed, Hasabelnaby, & Hassanien, 2013;Issa, 2013;Kolo et al, 2015;Mohammed & Ahmed, 2017;Srilatha et al, 2015;Tabar et al, 2017;Zaim & Atlas, 2016) indicates that the values measured in this study are relatively higher. Meanwhile, the reported values in this study are less than the values reported in Cyprus and Turkey (Merdanoǧlu & Altinsoy, 2006;Tzortzis, Svoukis, & Tsertos, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The chance of developing cancer over a lifetime due to human exposure to ionizing radiation can be calculated using ELCR according to Equations 15, 16, and 17 (Darwish et al, 2015;Issa, 2013;Kaliprasad, Vinutha, & Narayana, 2017;Kolo, Aziz, Khandaker, Asaduzzaman, & Amin, 2015):…”
Section: Excess Life Cancer Risk (Elcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity concentration measured in this study was compared with those from local and other countries (Table 3) [7,26,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. The values of 226 Ra activity concentration in our study are lower than the values in similar studies in Yemen, Hungary, Yunnan, China, Turkey, Thailand, Algeria, Egypt, Pakistan, Iraq, and Jordan, while it is little higher than that of Sudan, Nigeria, and Malaysia, and within the range of India.…”
Section: Activity Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%