2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of quicklime mixing for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the pH values of the EMR slurry were almost constant after 20 min for CaO and NaOH respectively and the pH value stabilised at approximately 7 for CaO, although the pH value of the slurry with CaO was higher than with NaOH due to the slower release of hydroxyl anion from the hydrolysis of CaO. Seeing that CaO was applied widely in the restoration and remediation of polluted soils, where it promoted reactions such as flocculation, ion exchange, lime carbonisation and clay mineral dissolution between the polluted soil and its pore water [19] and the price of per ton of CaO was about one-fifth of NaOH, CaO was a preferable choice as the additive to precipitate manganese from the EMR by CO 2 . Figure 4 shows the ORP change of reaction process at 800 mL/min CO 2 flow rate with 5% CaO.…”
Section: Characterization Of Raw Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the pH values of the EMR slurry were almost constant after 20 min for CaO and NaOH respectively and the pH value stabilised at approximately 7 for CaO, although the pH value of the slurry with CaO was higher than with NaOH due to the slower release of hydroxyl anion from the hydrolysis of CaO. Seeing that CaO was applied widely in the restoration and remediation of polluted soils, where it promoted reactions such as flocculation, ion exchange, lime carbonisation and clay mineral dissolution between the polluted soil and its pore water [19] and the price of per ton of CaO was about one-fifth of NaOH, CaO was a preferable choice as the additive to precipitate manganese from the EMR by CO 2 . Figure 4 shows the ORP change of reaction process at 800 mL/min CO 2 flow rate with 5% CaO.…”
Section: Characterization Of Raw Emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Donald et al, 2004). Moreover, it was reported that quicklime can be used as a restoration agent for heavy metals (Moon, 2005) and oil pollution (Schifano et al, 2007) in soil. In addition, quicklime can neutralise acidic soils (Mayfield et al, 2004) and increase soil enzymatic activity and soil nutrients (Li et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using quicklime to remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from soil was reported in previous studies (Matsumoto et al, 1995;Schifano et al, 2007). Matsumoto et al (1995) documented that up to 99.9% of the TCE in soil was removed by mixing quicklime by shovel with soil at 1e4% by weight every 5 h for 20 h. However, a low concentration of TCE (16 mg/kg) was used for their experiment and the detailed gas-phase compounds formed by the treatment were not examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsumoto et al (1995) documented that up to 99.9% of the TCE in soil was removed by mixing quicklime by shovel with soil at 1e4% by weight every 5 h for 20 h. However, a low concentration of TCE (16 mg/kg) was used for their experiment and the detailed gas-phase compounds formed by the treatment were not examined. Schifano et al (2007) examined the impact of quicklime mixing on petroleum contaminated soils using batch tests for 1, 15, and 30 days. They found petroleum hydrocarbon compounds decreased in the treated soils by analyzing the treated materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%