2013
DOI: 10.2298/bah1302363p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of quality of semi-natural grasslands of central Serbia upon phytosociological and numerical analysis

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present a numeric-statistical model by which it is possible to evaluate the quality of the observed grassland upon floristic and vegetation assessment. Thanks to this new methodological approach, the impact of each individual plant species on overall quality of the grassland could be estimated. The main goal was to determine species which significantly determine the pastoral value of the grassland. The quality (pastoral value) of the grassland was calculated using the numerical valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was particularly surprising that phytosociological and functional classifications combined (P+F) predicted pastoral value the best, because i) yield, part of the pastoral value equation, is predicted well by agronomic classification, and ii) calculating the pastoral value requires the pastoral value and relative biomass of each species, which is provided by agronomic classification (Daget and Poissonet, 1971). Functional traits (Tasset et al, 2019) and phytosociology (Petrovic et al, 2013) can be used to predict forage quality, but our result shows that combining them improves predictions. Phytosociology alone may not be sufficient to predict pastoral value due to the inclusion of different facies in the same phytosociological class (Bagella and Roggero, 2004).…”
Section: Combining Classifications: a Solution?mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was particularly surprising that phytosociological and functional classifications combined (P+F) predicted pastoral value the best, because i) yield, part of the pastoral value equation, is predicted well by agronomic classification, and ii) calculating the pastoral value requires the pastoral value and relative biomass of each species, which is provided by agronomic classification (Daget and Poissonet, 1971). Functional traits (Tasset et al, 2019) and phytosociology (Petrovic et al, 2013) can be used to predict forage quality, but our result shows that combining them improves predictions. Phytosociology alone may not be sufficient to predict pastoral value due to the inclusion of different facies in the same phytosociological class (Bagella and Roggero, 2004).…”
Section: Combining Classifications: a Solution?mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Once developed, the use of phytosociological classifications requires only a complete botanical relevé and less than an hour in each field. Phytosociology can also be used to predict agronomic characteristics, such as forage quality, and environmental characteristics by using indicator species (Petrovic et al, 2013); however, coefficients of abundance-dominance correlate only weakly with each species' percentage of total grassland biomass (i.e. relative biomass) , which can skew assessment of agronomic characteristics (Daget and Poissonet, 1971;Pittarello et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%