Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants Compared with the All-on-Four Concept: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Fernández‐Ruiz, Juan Alberto; Sánchez‐Siles, Mariano; Sánchez, Yolanda Guerrero; Pato-Mourelo, Jesús; Camacho-Alonso, Fabio

doi:10.3390/ijerph18073426

Cited by 17 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The four final studies selected were randomised controlled trials published in English (Fernández Olarte et al 2015;Felice et al, 2020;Pistilli et al, 2020;Fernández-Ruiz et al, 2021). One study was a split mouth randomised controlled trial and the remaining were 2-arm parallel design randomised controlled trials.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Use of Zygomatic Implants in Severe Maxillary Atrophy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conventional implant treatment cannot always be used to rehabilitate edentulous patients with advanced maxillary atrophic. Zygomatic dental implants have been used over the past 20 years as an alternative treatment solution to bone grafting. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the implant and prosthetic survival rate in non-oncologic patients with a severely atrophic maxilla. This review also aims to better understand the rate of peri-operative complications in this cohort of patients. A multi-database (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHAL) focused systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Any randomised control trials studies involving human participants treated with zygomatic osseous implants were included. After eliminating duplicates, a total of 4 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis review. With all the studies included there was a total of 174 patients treated with zygomatic osseous implants. The overall implant success rate was 98.03 %. The prosthetic success rate was 96.4 %. The most frequent peri-operative complication was sinusitis. Based on the limited data available in literature, zygomatic dental implants represent a valid alternative to bone augmenting procedure. However, they are not without risks and longer follow-ups are required to confirm the validity of the treatment in long term.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The risk of bias of the included studies are represented in Figure 6. conducted by Fernández Olarte et (2015) and Fernández-Ruiz et al (2021). They had a high risk of bias due to no explanation regarding the blinding process.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Zygomatic Implants in Severe Maxillary Atrophy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another common option and alternative for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla are zygomatic fixtures. Several studies indicated a high success rate and predictability [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. However, there are no clinically applicable criteria for success and the definition of “success” is used as a very flexible term.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An exception is the study by Fernández-Ruiz et al (2021). These authors examined the quality of life and satisfaction in 40 patients who were rehabilitated with fixed prostheses supported by a combination of zygoma fixtures and conventional implants (anterior region) [ 19 ]. Patients’ follow-up treatments were 19.40 ± 4.37 months and a mean VAS of 18.48 ± 3.42 was reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)

Borre

Neef

Loomans

et al. 2023

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subperiosteal implants (SIs) were first developed by Dahl in 1941 for oral rehabilitation in case of severe jaw atrophy. Over time, this technique was abandoned due to the high success rate of endosseous implants. The emergence of patient-specific implants and modern dentistry allowed a revisitation of this 80-year-old concept resulting in a novel “high-tech” SI implant. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes in forty patients after maxillary rehabilitation with an additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI®). The oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) and numerical rating (NRS) scale were used to assess patient satisfaction and evaluate oral health. In total, fifteen men (mean age: 64.62 years, SD ± 6.75 years) and twenty-five women (mean age: 65.24 years, SD ± 6.77 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 917 days (SD ± 306.89 days) after AMSJI installation. Patients reported a mean OHIP-14 of 4.20 (SD ± 7.10) and a mean overall satisfaction based on the NRS of 52.25 (SD ± 4.00). Prosthetic rehabilitation was achieved in all patients. AMSJI is a valuable treatment option for patients with extreme jaw atrophy. Patients enjoy treatment benefits resulting in high patient satisfaction rates and impact on oral health.

show abstract

“…The OHIP-EDENT is a commonly utilized tool, considered principally described and demonstrated good reliability and validity. 11 , 12 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Quality of Life and Supporting Structures in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Cohort Study

Rahim¹,

Ashour²

2022

CCIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To assess oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), marginal bone loss (MBL), and changes in soft tissue including probing pocket depth and implant stability in 2 implants retained mandibular overdentures during 5 years follow-up periods. Methods Forty completely edentulous patients with age 51–64 years were recruited for that longitudinal cohort study. Complete dentures were performed for all participants. Two implants (3.6 × 11.5 mm) were installed in the canine areas of the mandible. OHRQoL and MBL measures were performed every 1 year for 5 years, while clinical measures were made every 6 months for 60 months. Data were examined using repeated ANOVA and Friedman test. Results Thirty-seven patients had 74 implants; with mean age 56 ± 3.6 years; 43% females (n = 16) and 57% males (n = 21) accomplished the study. There were statistically significant differences in OHRQoL, MBL, and changes in soft tissue, including probing pocket depth and implant stability in 2 implants retained mandibular overdentures during 5 years follow-up periods, p ≤ 0.05. Conclusion Mandibular overdentures retained by 2 implants provide a positive long-term effect on OHRQoL, MBL, probing pocket depth, and implant stability.

show abstract

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants Compared with the All-on-Four Concept: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Cited by 17 publications

References 29 publications

The Use of Zygomatic Implants in Severe Maxillary Atrophy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

The Use of Zygomatic Implants in Severe Maxillary Atrophy: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review of Randomised Clinical Trials

Patient Satisfaction and Impact on Oral Health after Maxillary Rehabilitation Using a Personalized Additively Manufactured Subperiosteal Jaw Implant (AMSJI)

Assessment of Quality of Life and Supporting Structures in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Cohort Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About