2011
DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Proliferation Resistance of Plutonium Based on Decay Heat

Abstract: The present paper is prepared for the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Proliferation resistance of plutonium can be enhanced by increasing the decay heat of plutonium. For example, it can be enhanced by increasing the isotopic fraction of 238 Pu, which has the largest decay heat among plutonium isotopes. In the present paper, the proliferation resistance of plutonium was evaluated based on decay heat with a physical assessment model. New criteria were proposed to evaluate the proliferation resistance based on i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 8 shows evaluation results of ATTR index of the blanket fuel during irradiation in FBR, satisfying the criterion proposed by Kimura et al (2011) to hinder the fission explosive device manufacturing by means of the decay heat. When the moderators were heterogeneously loaded into the blanket as described in section 3.1 and 3.2, namely 2.5 wt.% TRU doping ratio to UO 2 fuel.…”
Section: Non-proliferation Aspectmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 8 shows evaluation results of ATTR index of the blanket fuel during irradiation in FBR, satisfying the criterion proposed by Kimura et al (2011) to hinder the fission explosive device manufacturing by means of the decay heat. When the moderators were heterogeneously loaded into the blanket as described in section 3.1 and 3.2, namely 2.5 wt.% TRU doping ratio to UO 2 fuel.…”
Section: Non-proliferation Aspectmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the term of technical difficulty, spontaneous neutron and radiation dose terms are omitted in the present paper because of the advanced level of the state technology, as same formula as the reference (Kimura et al, 2011). Fig.…”
Section: Non-proliferation Aspectmentioning
confidence: 98%