2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of prognostic factors for Peg Interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin treatment on HCV infected patients in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, RVR measured at week 4 is a strong predictor of SVR, which was achieved by 96.0% of patients ( n = 525). This outcome was consistent with other reported studies [20] and patients achieving RVR may be suitable candidates for shorter treatment durations, minimizing the economic burden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, RVR measured at week 4 is a strong predictor of SVR, which was achieved by 96.0% of patients ( n = 525). This outcome was consistent with other reported studies [20] and patients achieving RVR may be suitable candidates for shorter treatment durations, minimizing the economic burden.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To define the predictive value of biochemical parameters we assessed the potential link between baseline ALT, GGT activity and response to antiviral treatment, and only GGT level was found to be correlated highly with SVR as an independent factor; these results are consistent with those reported by other investigators [12, 16, 27]. We did not confirm the correlation between pretreatment ALT level and sustained virological response observed by some investigators [6, 25, 27, 28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…RVR was a powerful predictive factor of SVR in previous studies, showing as patients with RVR had ratio of SVR meaningfully higher than others; moreover some studies suggest RVR as the most important SVR predictor. [17][18][19][20] Villela-Nogueira et al [21] identified that higher levels of GT during a pre-treatment may be a independent negative predictive factor of response to treatment: being a biochemical parameter easily available and at low cost, it may be incorporated in evaluation of response to treatment alongside with other predictive factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent works do not detect a significant influence of genre even though both identified a meaningfully greater response in women younger than 40-50 years compared to the eldest ones Other studies consider the male gender as one of the strongest factors to predict SVR. [17,25] Furthermore data concerning rates of SVR in women are conflicting; studies which identified female gender as an independent factor linked to SVR or which noticed as not exist meaningful differences in genders were not stratified by age and considered not differences in female hormonal status; [20,22,23] other studies suggested a better response in women even after splitting the sample into age groups. [13,19,23,24] Few studies lead to identify alike responses in < 40-50 year-old patients of both genders: recent works detected not a significant influence of gender even though in presence of a better response in < 40-50 year-old women compared to the elder ones; other studies considered the male gender as a strong factors to predict SVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%