1996
DOI: 10.1080/1047322x.1996.10389964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Procedures for Production of Dust Samples for Biomedical Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven building materials were chosen for determination of particle size distribution (in alphabetic order): 1) cement; 2) chalk; 3) clay; 4) gypsum; 5) hydrated lime; 6) masonry grout; 7) quartz sand; 8) sand; 9) structural lime; 10) wood grinding dust and 11) wood sawdust. Building materials used in laboratory studies were selected in accordance to in reality used building materials to ensure uniform particle size distribution as possible, their shape, composition, and other important properties (Kaya et al 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven building materials were chosen for determination of particle size distribution (in alphabetic order): 1) cement; 2) chalk; 3) clay; 4) gypsum; 5) hydrated lime; 6) masonry grout; 7) quartz sand; 8) sand; 9) structural lime; 10) wood grinding dust and 11) wood sawdust. Building materials used in laboratory studies were selected in accordance to in reality used building materials to ensure uniform particle size distribution as possible, their shape, composition, and other important properties (Kaya et al 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon receipt, the samples were coarse (ranging from 5 cm to 180 µm) and thus required milling to reduce the particle size to the size range of dust. To achieve this, a process was developed to reduce the final particle size of the population to approximately 25 µm or less applying methods defined by previous authors [12,[59][60][61] (further described in Supplementary Section S3).…”
Section: Sample Description and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dozens of varieties of dust generation/resuspension/ sampling chambers have been described in literature; previous reviews of some devices were made by Kaya et al [3] and Willeke [4] for biomedical applications and by Cowherd and Grelinger [5] for wind erosion and fugitive dust research. Dust generation and dustiness testing instruments have been designed for a wide variety of purposes: for simulating indoor air in dusty manufacturing facilities [6]; for industrial process control [7]; in the pharmaceutical industry (where the objective may be to develop devices such as dry-powder inhalers that maximize the concentration of fine aerosols, for optimal delivery into the respiratory tract) [8][9][10][11][12][13]; exposing laboratory animals to mineral aerosols for respiratory disease studies [14,15]; preparing samples for chemical analysis [16]; measuring ecophysiological effects of dust accumulation on leaves [17]; simulating solid particle penetration into buildings [18,19]; or even to predict mineral dust accumulation or dispersion on other planets or outer space [20].…”
Section: A Review Of Laboratory Dust Aerosol Generation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dust generated in a laboratory setting should be similar in particle size, shape and composition to ambient dust aerosols or at least some component of them, and free of contamination resulting from the (dust generation) process [3]. This paper documents and categorizes the many devices used by various research groups to generate dry powder aerosols in the laboratory with applications to geological dust generation and dustiness testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%