2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10091375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of PROBA-V Collection 1: Refined Radiometry, Geometry, and Cloud Screening

Abstract: PROBA-V (PRoject for On-Board Autonomy-Vegetation) was launched in May-2013 as an operational continuation to the vegetation (VGT) instruments on-board the Système Pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT)-4 and -5 satellites. The first reprocessing campaign of the PROBA-V archive from Collection 0 (C0) to Collection 1 (C1) aims at harmonizing the time series, thanks to improved radiometric and geometric calibration and cloud detection. The evaluation of PROBA-V C1 focuses on (i) qualitative and quantitative asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lack of propellant onboard PROBA-V, the overpass time (10:45 at launch) decreases as a result of increasing atmospheric drag [8] and was 09:46 as of 24 September 2019. Due to the absence of on-board calibration devices, the radiometric calibration and stability monitoring of the PROBA-V instrument relies on vicarious and lunar calibration [9,10].…”
Section: Proba-vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of propellant onboard PROBA-V, the overpass time (10:45 at launch) decreases as a result of increasing atmospheric drag [8] and was 09:46 as of 24 September 2019. Due to the absence of on-board calibration devices, the radiometric calibration and stability monitoring of the PROBA-V instrument relies on vicarious and lunar calibration [9,10].…”
Section: Proba-vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, an small gap in performance is observed between results in the source domain (Plan-etScope) and the target domain (Sentinel-2). Finally, in our previous work [5], we showed that transfer learning from Proba-V to Landsat-8 and from Landsat-8 to Proba-V produce accurate results on a par with the FMask [22] model on Landsat-8 and surpassing the operational cloud detection model [27] for Proba-V, respectively. However, a significant gap between transfer learning approaches and state-of-the-art models trained with data from the same domain still exists, which is the focus of the present work.…”
Section: A Transfer Learning For Cloud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We also included the results of the ablation study, where we have set some of the weights of the generator losses to zero and the results using histogram matching [36] for domain adaptation as in [47]. In addition, results are compared with the FCNN trained in original Proba-V images and ground truths (PV-trained), which serves as an upper bound reference, and with the operational Proba-V cloud detection algorithm (v101) [27]. First of all, we see that the proposed DA method increases the mean overall accuracy and reduce the standard deviation of the metrics compared with direct transfer learning (no DA) or with adjusting the reflectance of each band Proba-V (PV) PV → LU L8-Upscaled (LU) with histogram matching.…”
Section: B Domain Adaptation For Cloud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It served as a basis for comparing algorithms participating in the Round Robin exercise [4]. However, this dataset has never been revealed to participants, even after the end of the exercise [10].…”
Section: Validation Dataset (Gold Standard)mentioning
confidence: 99%