2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12244023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Precipitation Products by Using Multiple Hydrological Models over the Upper Yellow River Basin, China

Abstract: In this study, 6 widely used precipitation products APHRODITE, CPC_UNI_PRCP, CN05.1, PERSIANN-CDR, Princeton Global Forcing (PGF), and TRMM 3B42 V7 (TMPA), were evaluated against gauge observations (CMA data) from 1998 to 2014, and applied to streamflow simulation over the Upper Yellow River basin (UYRB), using 4 hydrological models (DWBM, RCCC-WBM, GR4J, and VIC). The relative membership degree (u), as the comprehensive evaluation index in the hydrological evaluation, was calculated by the optimum fuzzy model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of this study indicate that out of eight different PPs considered in this study, APHRODITE was suitable to simulate observed streamflow during calibration and validation periods with an accepted accuracy for both the Chirah and Dhoke Pathan subcatchments at daily and monthly temporal scales, thereby fulfilling the first purpose (see paragraph above). This finding is in line with previous findings [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], which highlighted the good performance of APHRODITE for streamflow prediction in catchments with distinct characteristics. Overall, the better performance of APHRODITE in simulating observed streamflow for both sub-catchments might be attributed to the fact that it is a gauge-based product and its development is based on daily precipitation records from a large number of meteorological stations in Asia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Results of this study indicate that out of eight different PPs considered in this study, APHRODITE was suitable to simulate observed streamflow during calibration and validation periods with an accepted accuracy for both the Chirah and Dhoke Pathan subcatchments at daily and monthly temporal scales, thereby fulfilling the first purpose (see paragraph above). This finding is in line with previous findings [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], which highlighted the good performance of APHRODITE for streamflow prediction in catchments with distinct characteristics. Overall, the better performance of APHRODITE in simulating observed streamflow for both sub-catchments might be attributed to the fact that it is a gauge-based product and its development is based on daily precipitation records from a large number of meteorological stations in Asia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Three streamflow components-surface streamflow, groundwater, and snowmelt flow-were considered along with the processes of rainfall, snowfall, and snowmelt in the catchment. This model is a simplified large-scale conceptual hydrological model with mechanisms of streamflow generation [46]. There are four parameters in the model and the inputs include monthly precipitation, temperature, and potential evaporation.…”
Section: Hydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al showed that APHRODITE reflected the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of precipitation in inland river basins and then compensated for the shortage of spatial precipitation data in the study area (Li et al, 2014 information-using-artificial) on the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding areas and found that APHRODITE performed best with the longest time span (> 50 years) and had a higher R 2 with a lower MAE and RMSE than that of CHIRPS and PERSIANN-CDR (Tan et al, 2020). APHRODITE had the best performance in the DAC, including the Heihe River basin (Tang et al, 2017), Qinghai Lake drainage system (Zhang et al, 2014), Xinjiang (Wang, Sun, et al, 2020), upper reaches of the Yellow River (Guan et al, 2020) and other mountainous areas (Mishra et al, 2019). Therefore, we used APHRODITE, which has been verified many times and is one of the most accurate precipitation records in the DAC, in this paper.…”
Section: Glacier Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%