DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-15419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of potassium soil tests and methods for mapping soil fertility properties in Iowa corn and soybean fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the soil-testing method influences the threshold values. In our study, the threshold values for the NH 4 OAc and M3 extractants were the same, as also observed in Barbagelata's similar study of corn and soybean yields (Barbagelata, 2006). Several other authors have also reported similar findings relating to the effects of these extractants on soil K (Gartley et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Available Soil Ksupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the soil-testing method influences the threshold values. In our study, the threshold values for the NH 4 OAc and M3 extractants were the same, as also observed in Barbagelata's similar study of corn and soybean yields (Barbagelata, 2006). Several other authors have also reported similar findings relating to the effects of these extractants on soil K (Gartley et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Available Soil Ksupporting
confidence: 90%
“…All these findings indicate that our study sites have a high potential to increase the productivity of maize by applying P fertilisers without affecting the environment, as the threshold value of Olsen-P is 40 ppm (Zhong et al, 2004, cited by Bai et al, 2013 that cause environmental pollution. The values of exchangeable K were far above the threshold values of soil exchangeable potassium for the growth of crops (Barbagelata, 2006;IPI, 2016), indicating that K application could not significantly improve maize production and productivity for the study sites. Adeoye and Agboola (1985) in Nigeria reported a critical level of exchangeable K that ranges from 0.6 to 0.8 cmol kg -1 of soil for maize, whereas Farina et al (1992) in South Africa reported 0.32 cmol L -1 for the production of maize-critical exchangeable K. The inherent potential of the soil is sufficient to supply the required quantities of K to produce maize in the study site for at least the present situation.…”
Section: Results Of Soil Analysis For the Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…, 2013) that cause environmental pollution. The values of exchangeable K were far above the threshold values of soil exchangeable potassium for the growth of crops (Barbagelata, 2006; IPI, 2016), indicating that K application could not significantly improve maize production and productivity for the study sites. Adeoye and Agboola (1985) in Nigeria reported a critical level of exchangeable K that ranges from 0.6 to 0.8 cmol kg -1 of soil for maize, whereas Farina et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The CEC of a soil partially depends upon the amount and type of clay minerals. CEC was observed to be positively related to the change of K levels in the soil samples when exposed to drying [28].…”
Section: Comparison Of Soil Potassium Test Based Upon Air-dried and Fmentioning
confidence: 91%