2014
DOI: 10.4236/health.2014.615226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Positive Predictive Value for Digital Panoramic Radiography in Comparison to Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Calcified Carotid Atheroma

Abstract: Aim: Detection of calcified carotid atheroma (CCA) has an important role in reducing the incidence of Cerebro Vascular Accident (CVA). The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of panoramic digital radiography in detecting atherosclerosis. Methods: It is descriptive-analytical diagnostic study. The people (22 to 62 years old) were referred to a radiology clinic to perform panoramic radiography for diagnosis of CCA. Individuals who were suspected were introduced to the radiology department of dental school… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, positive findings of the carotid artery on Doppler sonography have been confirmed using DPR. [ 22 23 ] In another study, it was reported that the confirmation of radiographic image of CACs by ultrasound and CT was 34.7% and 62.3%, respectively. [ 24 ] The sensitivity and specificity of PR were 22.2% and 90%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, positive findings of the carotid artery on Doppler sonography have been confirmed using DPR. [ 22 23 ] In another study, it was reported that the confirmation of radiographic image of CACs by ultrasound and CT was 34.7% and 62.3%, respectively. [ 24 ] The sensitivity and specificity of PR were 22.2% and 90%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with the findings of Alzoman [42] who also reported similar prevalence of CAC in the general dental population in 2012 with the sample size (n = 555) similar to that in the present study (n = 500). Some studies have also reported lower prevalence of 2.9% [51], 3.1% [3] and 2.43% [52], while others have reported higher prevalence of 9% [53], 6.8% [54] and 9.4% [55]. This variation in prevalence could be due to the differences in the sample size, sample population, age, dietary habits and lifestyle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%