2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of positional plagiocephaly: Conventional anthropometric measurement versus laser scanning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the clinic, the standard diagnostic procedure uses a sliding caliper or a craniometer as a tool for the manual measurement of the cranial deformity; this method is inconvenient and possibly inaccurate [ 10 , 11 ]. Although three-dimensional (3D) cranial scans are considered the gold standard in diagnosis and can provide more accurate and reliable information, they require an expensive laser scanner with a head cap and a skilled operator [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Other 3D imaging techniques, such as stereophotogrammetry and procedures involving structured light patterns, are becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis of skull abnormalities [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinic, the standard diagnostic procedure uses a sliding caliper or a craniometer as a tool for the manual measurement of the cranial deformity; this method is inconvenient and possibly inaccurate [ 10 , 11 ]. Although three-dimensional (3D) cranial scans are considered the gold standard in diagnosis and can provide more accurate and reliable information, they require an expensive laser scanner with a head cap and a skilled operator [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Other 3D imaging techniques, such as stereophotogrammetry and procedures involving structured light patterns, are becoming increasingly important for the diagnosis of skull abnormalities [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its importance, commonly used methodology include visual assessment and manual measurements using measuring tape and callipers [4][5][6]. These methodologies have low accuracy and provide very limited information [7]. Radiological images (Computed Tomography -CTand Magnetic Resonance Imaging -MRI-) are vital for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis and they are considered the gold standard for yielding 3D models [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis and evaluation are performed based on cranial asymmetry indexes estimated from anthropometric skull measurements. These measurements are usually extracted manually using calipers [8]. However, a high intra-and inter-observer variability of that method can be expected since accuracy of measurement will vary between investigators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%